Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Erratum to: searching for plasticity in dissociated cortical cultures on multi-electrode arrays

Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine20076:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-6-3

Received: 23 January 2007

Accepted: 08 February 2007

Published: 08 February 2007

The original article was published in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine 2006 5:16

After publication of this article [1], the authors became aware that the numerical codes for two of the datasets, protocols III.3 and III.4, were inadvertently confused during the writing of the paper. Accordingly, the following corrigenda apply:

  • Abstract, last line: For 'distributed electrical stimulation,' read 'elevated extracellular magnesium concentrations.'

  • Background, last paragraph before 'Results': For 'distributed multi-site stimuli [29],' read 'elevated extracellular magnesium concentrations.'

  • Results, third to last paragraph (after the equation ' Δ n spont S R n base S R n ctrl S R MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqqHuoarcqWGUbGBdaqhaaWcbaGaee4CamNaeeiCaaNaee4Ba8MaeeOBa4MaeeiDaqhabaGaem4uamLaemOuaifaaOGaeyyyIORaemOBa42aa0baaSqaaiabbkgaIjabbggaHjabbohaZjabbwgaLbqaaiabdofatjabdkfasbaakiabgkHiTiabd6gaUnaaDaaaleaacqqGJbWycqqG0baDcqqGYbGCcqqGSbaBaeaacqWGtbWucqWGsbGuaaaaaa@4E89@ '): For 'III.4,' read 'III.3' (two instances), and for '5 or 10 ms later', read '5 ms later.'

  • Results, second to last paragraph: For 'III.4,' read 'III.3.'

  • Results, final paragraph: For 'III.3,' read 'III.4.'

  • Figure 6A, right panel: For 'III.4,' read 'III.3.'

  • Figure 6B, two rightmost panels: For 'III.3 (magnesium burst quieting),' read 'III.4 (electrical burst quieting, long tet.)' and vice versa.

  • Figure 6, caption: For 'III.4,' read 'III.3' and vice versa (several instances). In particular: 'N = 67, 67, 167, 142 for protocols III.1, III.2, III.3, and III.4.'

  • Discussion, first paragraph following the caption One successful protocol with burst quieting in Series III: For 'III.4,' read 'III.3.' For '10 ms,' read '5 ms.'

  • Discussion, following paragraph: This paragraph ('The fact that ... tetanus') should be dropped entirely.

A version of the article with the above corrections marked is available from the authors' website [2].

Notes

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Biological Sciences, Neurobiology Section, University of California at San Diego
(2)
Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology
(3)
Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University

References

  1. Wagenaar DA, Pine J, Potter SM: Searching for plasticity in dissociated cortical cultures on multi-electrode arrays. J Negat Results Biomed. 2006, 5: 16-10.1186/1477-5751-5-16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Wagenaar DA, Pine J, Potter SM: Searching for plasticity in dissociated cortical cultures on multi-electrode arrays (with corrections). http://biology.ucsd.edu/~dwagenaa/jnrbm

Copyright

© Wagenaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement