Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Could titanium oxide coating from a sol–gel process make stone baskets more resistant to laser radiation at 2.1 μm?

Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine201211:15

  • Received: 6 August 2012
  • Accepted: 11 September 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Stone baskets could be easily destroyed by Holmium:YAG-laser at an endourologic treatment, with respect to this, we try to improve the resistance by coating them with a titanium oxide layer. The layer was established by a sol–gel-process.

Materials and methods

Six new baskets (Equadus, Opi Med, Ettlingen, Germany) were used: 1.8 Ch. with 4 wires (diameter 0.127 mm). Three baskets were coated with a layer of titanium oxide established by a sol–gel process at the BioCerEntwicklungs GmbH in Bayreuth (~100 nanometres thickness). The lithotripter was a Holmium:YAG laser (Auriga XL, Starmedtec, Starnberg, Germany). 10 uncoated and 10 coated wires were tested with 610 mJ (the minimal clinical setting) and 2 uncoated and 2 coated wires were tested with 110 mJ. The wires were locked in a special holding instrument under water and the laser incident angle was 90°. The endpoint was gross visible damage to the wire and loss of electric conduction.


Only two coated wires resisted two pulses (one in the 610 mJ and one in the 110 mJ setting). All other wires were destroyed after one pulse.


This was the first attempt at making stone baskets more resistant to a Holmium:YAG laser beam. Titanium oxide deposited by a sol–gel-process on a titanium-nickel alloy did not result in better resistance to laser injuries


  • Visible Damage
  • Titanium Oxide Layer
  • Flexible Ureteroscopes
  • Coated Wire
  • Dormia Basket


An increase in the prevalence of urolithiasis to 5%, i.e. an increase of 25 percent within 20 years, was ascertained in Germany in 2000[1].

The further development of instrumental technique towards extremely thin and even flexible ureteroscopes as well as modern lithotripsy procedures with various energy sources has once again placed special emphasis on endoscopic and percutaneous minimally invasive techniques[2].

One endoscopic procedure is endourologic lithotripsy in which the stone is destroyed in the ureter. Sometimes the stone is simultaneously stabilized by a stone basket. These baskets are made of nitinol a shape memory alloy of nickel and titanium (melting point ~ 1300°C)[3]. This stabilization of the stone in the basket could be on purpose or by accident. By accident means that an impaction in the ureter occurs by an extraction of a stone with a basket. Stabilization on purpose means to avoid a retropulsion into the kidney during a lithotripsy with a stone in the stone basket. At this part of the operation stone baskets have been frequently destroyed[4]. This severing of wires can lead to ureteral trauma due to hook formation[5]. On the other hand it could release the impacted stone in the basket from the basket by destructing all wires of the basket[6].

How quickly fragmentation with the laser occurs has been examined in vitro by Honeck et al.[7]. Baskets with a diameter of 3 Ch. were destroyed in 15–34 seconds and tipless Nitinol baskets (1.8 Ch. diameter) were destroyed in 1–4 seconds with a pulse energy of 0.8 and 2 J and a pulse frequency of 5 Hz. The guidance of the optical fibre occurred by means of a cystoscope in a container filled with water.

Cordes et al.[8] investigated four lithotripter and four different types of stone baskets. In this study they showed that the resistance of the baskets depends on the thickness of the wires. Also plaited wires seem to be more resistant to the radiation of the laser. An overview of accidental fragmentation of dormia basket and guidewire showed that this problem should be further investigated[9].

This study attempted to make stone baskets more resistant to a Holmium:YAG-laser by coating them with a titanium oxide layer established by a sol–gel process. This process was investigated by BioCer, and is normally used for polymer medical implants such as hernia meshes or hard-tissue implants. Because of the biocompatibility, the industrial availability and clinical experience with this layer we tested this layer on the basket-wires. The crystal class is tetragonal (rutil) which is the most common form of Titanium Dioxide. Rutil is hard, chemically resistant and has a high refractive index.

Material and methods

The lithotripter was a Holmium:YAG laser (Auriga XL, Starmedtec, Starnberg, Germany). Six new baskets (Equadus Opti Med, Ettlingen, Germany), tipless basket, 4 wires (diameter 0.07 mm), 1.8 F, nitinol) were used (Figure1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Stone basket with 4 wires 1,8 F(Equadus Opti Med, Ettlingen, Germany).

Three baskets were coated with a layer of titanium oxide established by a sol–gel process at the BioCerEntwicklungs GmbH in Bayreuth (~100 nanometres thick). At this process only the surface of the basket wire is changed. The retention of this new surface was extremely close. In a study with mash grafts for hernioplasty it could not be broken off by mechanical force[10]. The wires were locked in a special holding instrument under water and the laser incident angle was 90° (Figure2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Schematic of the experimental setup.

  1. 10

    uncoated and 10 coated wires were tested with 610 mJ the minimal clinical setting. After seeing no significant difference in the destruction time the energy for 2 uncoated and 2 coated wires was reduced to 110 mJ.

The time and the pulses until destruction were measured and were documented by video. The endpoint was gross visible damage to the wire and loss of electric conduction. It was measured by a Multimeter (2010 DMM, Peaktech, Ahrensburg, Germany). The Modus called “Durchgangsprüfung mit Summer” in which a permanent sound signal indicates an intact conduction and a loss of this signal shows an interruption of conduction (Figure3).
Figure 3
Figure 3

The investigational setting with the “multimeter”, the holding instrument and the laser fibre with a 90° incident angle.

The laser was set to a repetition rate of 8 Hz and pulse energy of ~ 610 mJ. The laser fibre diameter was 365 μm and was in direct contact with the wire. The wavelength was 2.1 μm and the pulse period was 100-300 μs.


At the 610 mJ setting one coated wire was destroyed after 2 Pulses. All other wires were destroyed after 1 Pulse (9 coated and 10 uncoated wires) When the energy was reduced to 110 mJ one coated wire needed 2 Pulses. The others were destroyed after one Pulse (1 coated and 2 uncoated wires). All wires had a gross visible damage and the sound signal of the multimeter for an intact conduction stopped (Figure4).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Microscopic picture of the gross visible damage of the wire with the typical melting drop (upper picture with a magnification of 60 and lower picture with a magnification of 200).


Further, prior work showed how baskets fracture across various compositions and configurations within modest range of Ho:YAG power settings[11]. This was a first attempt to improve the resistance of stone baskets to a laser beam of a Holmium:YAG laser. Nitinol is a self-passivating material. It naturally forms a surface oxide layer mainly TIO2-based with minimal amounts of nickel that protects the base material from general corrosion[12]. This layer is only some atom-layers thin and mechanically unstable[13]. By comparison with vapour deposition methods such as ion beam enhanced deposition, arc ion plating etc., by which it is difficult to form uniform coatings on the substrates with complex shapes, the sol–gel coating technique has advantages with regard to the independence of substrate shape (stone baskets) and adequate control of coating composition, thickness and topography[14]. This process is normally used in multiple layers for making glass harder[15] or for medical applications such as a functional coating for hard tissue implants[16]. In the present case, the authors assumed that the layer would also raise the resistance of the surface. Titanium oxide layers have optical effects and could raise reflection[15]. In the setting by Cordes et al. 2011[8] it took some seconds to destroy the wires of the small basket. This differs from the present results and can be attributed to the clinical setting, in which Cordes et al.[8] used a renoscope, an artificial ureter and a basket that contained a stone. It appears that in this setup the wire was not fixed as closely as in the holding instrument in the current study, and that the laser incident angel is also important for the resistance. This is also shown in the experimental study of Freiha et al. in which a guidewire-damage varied with the inverse of the cosine of the incident angle[17].

Over all only two coated wires resisted 2 Pulses instead of one. It must be stated that the power of the laser for such a thin wire is too great for any significant differences to be observed. Maybe we should take a thicker basket and multiple layers of titan dioxide.

We think further investigations of wire materials maybe in combination with plaiting the wires should be done. Another option possibly arises through development of a metal detection in conjunction with an automatic deactivation (e.g. the holmium:YAG laser) in order to prevent the melting of a wire. A guided laser system in future should discriminate wire, stone and organic tissue.


This was the first attempt at making stone baskets more resistant to a Holmium:YAG laser beam. Titanium oxide deposited by a sol–gel-process on a titanium-nickel alloy did not result in better resistance to laser injuries.


Authors’ Affiliations

Clinic of Urology, University of Lübeck, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, RatzeburgerAllee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany
BioCerEntwicklungs GmbH Bayreuth (BioCer development Bayreuth), Bayreuth, Germany


  1. Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann K-U, Alken P: Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. EurUrol. 2003, 44: 709-713.Google Scholar
  2. Müller SC, Hofmann R, Köhrmann K-U, Hesse A: Epidemiologie, instrumentelle Therapie und Metaphylaxe des Harnsteinleidens. DtschArztebl. 2004, 101: A1331-A1336.Google Scholar
  3. Stoeckel D: Nitinol Medical Devices and Implants. Min Invas Ther & Allied Technol. 2000, 9 (2): 81-88. 10.3109/13645700009063054.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Smith AD, Baldlani G, Bagley D, v. Clayman R, Docimo SG, Jordan GH, Kavoussi LR, Lee BR, Lingeman JE, Preminger GM, Segura JW: Textbook of Endourology. 2007, Canada: BC Decker, secondGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael L, Gallentine MD, Jay T, Bishoff MD, William J, Harmon MD: The Broken Stone Basket: Configuration and Technique for Removal. J Endourol. 2001, 15 (9): 911-914. 10.1089/089277901753284125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Teichman JM, Kamerer AD: Use of the holmium:YAG laser for the impacted stone basket. J Urol. 2000, 164 (5): 1602-1603. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67038-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Häcker A, Alken P, Knoll T: Risk of collateral damage to endourologic tools by holmium:YAG laser energy. J Endourol. 2006, 20 (7): 495-497. 10.1089/end.2006.20.495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordes J, Lange B, Jocham D, Kausch I: Destruction of stone extraction basket during an in vitro lithotripsy — a comparison of four lithotripters. J Endourol. 2011, 25 (8): 1359-1362. 10.1089/end.2011.0019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordes J, Jocham D, Kausch I: Endourological lithotripsy for stone removal. Accidental fragmentation of dormia basket and guidewire – a brief overview. Urologe A. 2010, 49 (11): 1365-1367. 10.1007/s00120-010-2383-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinlein M, Heidenau F: Biokompatible Textilbeschichtungen: Ein Potenzial für Herniennetze?. Medizintechnik Bayern. 2009, 8: 36-37.Google Scholar
  11. Gallentine ML, Bishoff JT, Harmon WJ: The broken stone basket: configuration and technique for removal. J Endourol. 2001, 15 (9): 911-914. 10.1089/089277901753284125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wever DJ, Veldhuizien AG, de Vries J, Busscher HJ, Uges DRA, van Horn JR: Electrochemical and surface characterization of a nickel-titanium alloy. Biomaterials. 1998, 19: 761-10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00210-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shevchenko N, Maitz M, Pham MT: Verfahren zur Herstellung einer nickelarmen Oberfläche auf Nitinol. 2005, Patent-DE. 2004 DE10325410B4 14.04.2005Google Scholar
  14. Fu T, Liu BG, Zhou M, Wu XM: Sol–gel titania coating on NiTi alloy with a porustitania film as interlayer. J Sol–gel Sci Technol. 2011, 58: 307-331. 10.1007/s10971-010-2392-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt HK: Anorganische Synthesemethoden. Das Sol–gel-Verfahren. Chemie Unserer Zeit. 2001, 35 (3): 176-184. 10.1002/1521-3781(200106)35:3<176::AID-CIUZ176>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidenau F, Mittelmeier W, Detsch R, Haenle M, Stenzel F, Ziegler G, Gollwitzer H: A novel antibacterial titania coating: Metal ion toxicity and in vitro surface colonization. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2005, 16: 883-888. 10.1007/s10856-005-4422-3.Google Scholar
  17. Freiha GS, Glickman RD, Teichman JM: Holmium:YAG laser-induced damage to guidewires: experimental study. J Endourol. 1997, 11 (5): 331-336. 10.1089/end.1997.11.331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Cordes et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.