Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Number of teeth and myocardial infarction and stroke among elderly never smokers

  • Anna-Maija H Syrjälä1, 2Email author,
  • Pekka Ylöstalo3,
  • Sirpa Hartikainen4, 5,
  • Raimo Sulkava6 and
  • Matti L Knuuttila7, 8
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine20098:6

DOI: 10.1186/1477-5751-8-6

Received: 19 December 2008

Accepted: 22 April 2009

Published: 22 April 2009



In most previous studies the association between number of teeth and cardiovascular diseases has been found to be stronger among younger age groups than in older age groups, which indicates that age may modify the association between number of teeth and cardiovascular diseases.

We investigated the association between tooth loss and atherosclerotic vascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and stroke in a homogeneous elderly population.

The study population was comprised of a subpopulation of 392 community-living elderly people who participated in the population-based Kuopio 75+ study. The data were collected through an interview, a structured clinical health examination and from patient records. The main outcome measures were a history of diagnosed myocardial infarction and diagnosed ischemic stroke. Prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) were estimated using generalised linear models.


Edentate subjects had a weakly, statistically non-significantly increased likelihood of a history of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke compared with dentate subjects. Those with a large number of teeth had a slightly, but not statistically significantly increased likelihood of a history of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke compared with those with a small number of teeth.


These data did not show evidence that total or partial tooth loss would be associated with atherosclerotic vascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke among an elderly population aged 75 years or older.


Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the main causes of death in the world, accounting for almost one third of all deaths world-wide [1] and about half of all deaths in Europe [2]. Cardiovascular diseases consist of heterogeneous groups of vascular diseases, with atherosclerotic vascular diseases being the commonest group. Although the risk factors of atherosclerotic vascular diseases include several risk factors such as abnormal lipids, hypertension, smoking and diabetes [3], a substantial proportion of cardiovascular events cannot be attributed to any of the risk factors [4].

During the past three decades, oral epidemiologists have been actively testing the hypothesis that oral infections may be aetiological factors in atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Different explanatory variables such as periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment loss or different indices have been used to measure the extent and/or severity of oral infection. Tooth loss, measured by number of teeth, has also been used as an explanatory variable, especially in situations where no other form of data is available.

In earlier studies, tooth loss has been associated with atherosclerotic diseases such as myocardial infarction (MI) [5, 6], coronary heart disease [7, 8] and stroke [9, 10]. In addition, total tooth loss, edentulism, has been associated with fatal coronary heart disease [11], stroke/transient ischemic attack [12], stroke [13] and nonhemorrhagic stroke as well as all cerebrovascular accidents [14]. On the other hand, other studies have failed to show any association between number of teeth and myocardial infarction [15, 16], myocardial infarction or angina pectoris or unstable angina [17] or coronary heart disease [18]. The association between tooth loss and cardiovascular diseases has been suggested to be due to different reasons, such as previous periodontal infections, caries, bacteraemia related to extractions, change in diet followed by tooth loss and biases such as selection bias, information bias and confounding related to attitudinal, behavioural and biological factors in common [19].

Most previous studies involve heterogeneous study populations that include both middle-aged and elderly persons; typically the mean age is under 70 years. Studies that have investigated the association in different age groups have shown that the association between number of teeth and cardiovascular diseases is stronger among younger age groups than in older age groups [9, 20], which indicates that age may modify the association between number of teeth and cardiovascular diseases. Our aim was to study whether there is an association between number of teeth and atherosclerotic diseases such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke among a homogenous study population aged 75 years or older.


The descriptive statistics of the study population are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants


All (n = 390)


Dentate (n = 169)


Edentate (n = 221)




Proportion of males




Marital status










Living alone




High education




Table 2

Cardiovascular diseases and potential risk factors among dentate and edentate participants



(n = 390)


(n = 169)


(n = 221)

Cardiovascular diseases


   Myocardial infarction (%)




   Stroke (%)




Potential risk factors of cardiovascular diseases


   BMI: mean (SD)

26.4 (4.6)

25.9 (4.5)

26.9 (4.6)

   BMI: ≥ 25 kg/m2* (%)




   Serum total cholesterol: mean (SD)

5.7 (1.2)

5.7 (1.2)

5.8 (1.2)

   Serum total cholesterol: ≥ 5.2 mmol/l* (%)




   Serum HDL cholesterol: mean (SD)

1.5 (0.4)

1.5 (0.4)

1.5 (0.4)

   Serum HDL cholesterol: ≤ 1.04 mmol/l* (%)




   Serum triglycerides: mean (SD)

1.5 (0.8)

1.4 (0.8)

1.6 (0.8)

   Serum triglycerides: ≥ 2.26 mmol/l* (%)




   Diabetes (%)




   Blood glucose: mean (SD)

5.6 (1.4)

5.5 (1.2)

5.8 (1.5)

   Hypertension (%)




   Alcohol consumption: Proportion of those who drink alcohol (%)




   Physical activity:


   No exercise (%)




   Slow walking or intense exercise 2–3 times a week (%)




*Serum triglycerides ≥ 2.26 mmol/l, serum HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.04 mmol/l, serum total cholesterol ≥ 5.2 mmol/l, and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 are regarded as CVD risk factors [29, 30].

After controlling for gender, age, basic education, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index (BMI), serum triglycerides and serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, dentate persons have a slightly, non-significantly decreased likelihood of having a history of myocardial infarction (PPR 0.9 95% CI: 0.5–1.8) or ischemic stroke (PPR 0.9 95% CI: 0.2–2.8) when compared with edentulous subjects. Number of teeth was weakly and statistically non-significantly associated with a history of myocardial infarction (PPR 1.01 95% CI: 0.97–1.05) and ischemic stroke (PPR 1.02 95% CI: 0.94–1.08) (Table 3).
Table 3

Association between number of teeth and presence of cardiovascular diseases among never-smokers.


Myocardial infarction

Myocardial infarction




Crude PPR (CI)

PPR (CI) *

Crude PPR (CI)

PPR (CI) *

Number of teeth (continuous)

1.00 (0.98–1.02)

1.01 (0.97–1.05)

0.99 (0.95–1.03)

1.02 (0.94–1.08)

Dentate vs. edentate

0.9 (0.6–1.3)

0.9 (0.5–1.8)

0.8 (0.4–1.7)

0.9 (0.2–2.8)

Gender (male vs. female)

1.5 (0.9–2.3)

1.8 (1.0–3.1)

1.0 (0.3–2.5)

0.8 (0.2–2.0)


1.06 (1.02–1.10)

1.07 (1.02–1.11)

1.00 (0.92–1.08)

0.97 (0.87–1.06)

Education (low vs. high)

1.1 (0.7–1.9)

1.4 (0.8–2.5)

2.2 (0.8–9.2)

2.7 (0.8–11.1)

Diabetes (no vs. yes)

0.6 (0.4–0.9)

0.5 (0.3–0.9)

0.4 (0.2–1.0)

0.5 (0.2–1.1)

Hypertension (no vs. yes)

0.9 (0.6–1.3)

1.0 (0.7–1.5)

0.6 (0.3–1.3)

1.0 (0.4–2.1)


1.04 (1.00–1.08)

1.03 (0.99–1.08)

1.00 (0.93–1.08)

0.97 (0.89–1.05)

Serum HDL cholesterol

0.83 (0.5–1.3)

1.50 (0.84–2.60)

0.32 (0.11–0.81)

0.23 (0.06–0.78)

Serum triglycerides


1.13 (0.90–1.43)

1.23 (0.82–1.69)

0.89 (0.48–1.34)

Alcohol consumption (no vs. yes)

1.3 (0.9–1.9)

1.3 (0.8–2.0)


0.8 (0.4–1.7)

Physical activity (no vs. yes)

1.3 (0.9–1.9)

1.1 (0.7–1.7)

1.3 (0.6–2.6)

1.2 (0.5–2.3)

Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

*Adjusted for gender, age (as a continuous variable), basic education, diabetes, hypertension, BMI (as a continuous variable), serum HDL cholesterol (as a continuous variable), serum triglycerides (as a continuous variable), alcohol consumption, physical activity.

The joint effect of dentulous/edentulous and number of teeth is presented in figures 1 and 2. It can be seen that the joint effect of these variables forms a J-shaped curve. From the figures it can be seen that the likelihood of a history of both MI and stroke is lowest among those with a small number of teeth. The equivalent point when compared with edentulous subjects was 5 teeth for MI and 8 teeth for stroke.
Figure 1

Prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) of myocardial infarction in relation to the number of teeth.
Figure 2

Prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) of stroke in relation to the number of teeth.

Due to unequal gender distribution, interactions between gender and explanatory variables were tested. The p-values for interaction terms between gender and number of teeth was 0.89 and between gender and dentate vs. edentate, 0.87, for myocardial infarction. For stroke, the corresponding values were 0.26 and 0.57.


The results did not provide evidence that partial tooth loss or edentulousness would be associated with myocardial infarction or stroke. In fact, these data showed that those with a large number of teeth might be more likely to have a history of diagnosed myocardial infarction and stroke, and that those with small residual dentition, i.e. subjects who had lost most of their teeth, might be least likely to have a history of MI and stroke. However, it must be emphasised that such extrapolations of the estimates of multivariate models as seen in figures 1 and 2 are as uncertain as the original estimates.

In order to reduce the effect of confounding, we adjusted for age, several classical cardiovascular risk factors, educational level and behavioural factors, which all were unequally distributed between dentate and edentate. In addition, we restricted the study to subjects who had never smoked, since complete control of smoking is otherwise considered impossible. The study population was quite homogeneous with regard to ethnic origin, age (75 or over), geographical distribution (residents in the town of Kuopio) and physical capacity (home-dwellers, not institutionalised), which also reduced confounding. However, despite profound adjustment and restrictions, the possibility that some residual confounding existed cannot beexcluded, especially related to those factors that are difficult or impossible to fully conceptualise, such as behavioural, attitudinal and socioeconomic factors. An additional reason why we did not find any significant associations could be that residual confounding related to strong determinants, such as education, for example, masks the effect of less powerful determinants.

The participation rate of this study was high, 86%, which reduced the possibility that participation in the study would be responsible for the findings. There was some bias related to the participation of subjects; the elderly people who did not participate in the study were somewhat older than the participants. Regarding gender, there was no essential difference in gender distribution between the participants and non-participants. The participants of this study were home-dwelling but not institutionalised subjects, meaning that the participants represented a selected subgroup of this age cohort in terms of general health status. This in turn may lead to a situation where high-risk subjects may not have been included in the study, because severe health problems may lead to institutionalisation, hospitalisation or premature deaths. Such selective survival leads to survival bias, which possibly prevents detection of a true association between tooth loss and atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Bias related to survival emphasises the need to perform incidence-type cohort studies instead of cross-sectional studies.

In this study, information was collected from patient records, which reduces the possibility that the findings were caused by an imbalance in information.

Limitations of the study

This study is a secondary analysis of data collected for other purposes. This has several implications. Firstly, we had a limited number of subjects; the original sample numbered 700, of which a fairly high proportion (86%) participated in the study. After restriction to never smokers, only 392 remained, and it is possible that this was too small a number to show any statistically significant differences in our estimates (dentate vs. edentate, number of teeth as a continuous variable). However, it must be remembered that estimates themselves are not dependent on the size of the study. Secondly, the fact that this was a secondary analysis also meant that oral examination was by no means comprehensive, and the number of remaining teeth, i.e. tooth loss, was the only suitable explanatory variable. This variable has a certain well-known shortcoming, namely, it is an indirect, unspecific and unreliable measure of a history of oral diseases. Previous studies suggest that periodontitis is common among elderly people [21] and they have often lost their teeth due to periodontal infection [22, 23]. However, it must be noted that we did not have any information about the reasons why teeth were lost, and tooth loss is most likely a confounded measure of oral health, since teeth probably have also been lost for several reasons, such as treatment of larger fractures, large caries lesions, acute pain or abscesses due to pulpal or periodontal involvement, for example. Moreover, a negative attitude towards preservation of natural teeth as well as economic constraints might lead to situations where subjects with low socioeconomic status prefer tooth extraction instead of more conservative treatment.

A self-evident limitation of this study is the use of cross-sectional data, which means the temporal sequence between explanatory and outcome variables cannot be determined. Myocardial infarction and stroke are end points in disease processes that have started years earlier. Possible causes of tooth loss, dental caries and periodontitis, for instance, are chronic diseases that may last for years or decades and may gradually lead to tooth loss. These aspects make it difficult to determine temporal sequence. On the other hand, temporal sequence can be in the opposite direction from what is expected. For example, severe heart disease may decrease capability to perform daily oral self-care routines. This in turn increases the incidence of dental caries and periodontal disease, which among severely diseased elderly people easily leads to extractions.

It must be emphasised that these data consisted of mostly women, which based on their higher life expectancy, is not surprising. Gender distribution also did not correspond to the total Finnish population in that age group, which most likely is due to the fact that smoking in those age groups has been commoner among men than women. On the other hand, it must be pointed out from the point of view of generalisation that we did not find any essential interaction between explanatory variables and gender, which suggests that the results can be generalised to persons of both genders aged 75 years or more who had never smoked.

Lastly, an obvious weakness of the study is that the clinical health examinations, which included a partial oral examination, were done by a geriatrician, and intra-examiner reliability was not evaluated. The same geriatrician did all the examinations, which eliminates variation due to disagreement between examiners, which is often present in large field studies. The fact that the same geriatrician did the clinical health examination meant that the geriatrician may have been aware of the disease history of the subject when performing the oral examination. Whether this had any affect on the results is not known, but the fact that the aim of this paper did not originally belong to the aims of this study project, means that bias in registration is therefore difficult to imagine. From the point of view of validity, it must be emphasised that the exposure variable, i.e. number of teeth, is quite simple and can be assessed fairly reliably even by non-dentists. According to previous studies, simple detectable dental conditions, also when self-reported, correspond quite well with clinical findings [24, 25].


These data suggest that in an elderly population, partial tooth loss or edentulousness is not associated with a history of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. The fact that we did not find such associations could be interpreted that there is no causal association among the elderly, or that association among the elderly is too weak to be observable in the presence of other determinants, or that biases such as different forms of selection bias or confounding may have prevented us from detecting the association between tooth loss and a history of myocardial infarction and stroke.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study population consisted of community-living participants in the population-based Kuopio 75+ study, which focused on the prevalence of chronic diseases, use of medication and functional capacity among persons aged 75 years or more. The study population was a random sample from a census register consisting of 700 persons drawn from the total population (n = 4518) born before 1 January 1923 and living in Kuopio on 1 January, 1998.

In 1998 a geriatrician and a trained nurse conducted structured clinical examinations and interviews among 601 persons (86% of the random sample). Of the sample, 79 subjects refused, 5 were not contacted, and 15 were dead. Elderly persons living in long-term facilities (n = 78) were excluded. The study design has been described in more detail in earlier reports [26, 27]. In this paper, we restricted the study population to subjects who had never smoked, and after that restriction the study population consisted of 392 home-dwelling persons aged 75 or more.

Written informed consent for the study was obtained from the subjects or their relatives. The ethics committee of the Kuopio University Hospital approved the study protocol.


Data on sociodemographic variables, physical health and health behaviour were collected using structured interviews. Education was categorised according to the subjects' basic education (classification for analysis: low education; elementary school or lower, some other form of education vs. high education; junior secondary school, senior secondary school, matriculation). Health behaviour variables included alcohol consumption (classification for analysis: alcohol consumption vs. no alcohol) and physical activity (classification for analysis: no exercise vs. slow walking or intense exercise 2–3 times a week).

Clinical health examination

The clinical health examination was done by a geriatrician. Myocardial infarction and stroke were determined from patient records. Previous myocardial infarction was determined on the basis of a recorded medical diagnosis or changes in an electrocardiogram suggestive of infarction. Stroke was determined based on verified occurrence of an ischemic stroke as a type of first cerebral palsy. Diabetes was determined on the basis of a recorded medical diagnosis or reimbursable medication. Hypertension was determined on the basis of a recorded medical diagnosis. Body mass index (BMI) was determined using body weight and height (body weight in kilograms/height in meters2), which were measured during the clinical examination. Basic laboratory tests were performed and analysed using standard enzymatic methods.

The clinical health examination included a partial oral examination, which was done by a geriatrician under the guidance of a dentist. It included recording the presence of a removable denture, the number of teeth, carious teeth and dental radix, mucosal lesions and a saliva sample.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using the SAS Genmod procedure. Adjusted prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) were estimated using Poisson distribution, a log link function, a REPEATED statement and an unstructured correlation matrix [2830]. In addition, risk estimates were calculated for different numbers of teeth as a joint function of two variables (dentulous/edentulous) and number of teeth (continuous). This was performed using an ESTIMATE statement in the SAS Genmod procedure.

Potential confounders included generally accepted risk factors of CVD or risk indicators of CVD that were available and were unequally distributed. The following variables were chosen: gender, age, basic education, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol consumption, physical activity, BMI, serum triglycerides and serum HDL cholesterol. Interactions between gender and the main explanatory variables (dentulous/edentulous) and number of teeth were tested.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu
Oulu Health Centre
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu
Faculty of Pharmacy, Kuopio Research Centre for Geriatric Care (Gerho), University of Kuopio
Leppävirta Health Centre
School of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition. Division of Geriatrics, University of Kuopio
Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu
Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Oulu University Hospital


  1. World Health Organization: The world health report 2004-changing history. 2004, World Health Organization. France, Scholar
  2. Peterson S, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A: European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. 2005, British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group. Health Comission Researh Center, Department of Public Health. University of Oxford, Scholar
  3. Vinereanu D: Risk factors for atherosclerotic disease: present and future. Herz. 2006, 31: 5-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hackam DG, Anand SS: Emerging risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease: a critical review of the evidence. JAMA. 2003, 290: 932-940. 10.1001/jama.290.7.932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Paunio K, Impivaara O, Tiekso J, Maki J: Missing teeth and ischaemic heart disease in men aged 45–64 years. Eur Heart J. 1993, 14: 54-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Holmlund A, Holm G, Lind L: Severity of periodontal disease and number of remaining teeth are related to the prevalence of myocardial infarction and hypertension in a study based on 4,254 subjects. J Periodontol. 2006, 77: 1173-1178. 10.1902/jop.2006.050233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Joshipura KJ, Rimm EB, Douglass CW, Trichopoulos D, Ascherio A, Willett WC: Poor oral health and coronary heart disease. J Dent Res. 1996, 75: 1631-1636. 10.1177/00220345960750090301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Loesche WJ, Schork A, Terpenning MS, Chen YM, Dominguez BL, Grossman N: Assessing the relationship between dental disease and coronary heart disease in elderly U.S. veterans. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998, 129: 301-311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Joshipura KJ, Hung HC, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Ascherio A: Periodontal disease, tooth loss, and incidence of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003, 34: 47-52. 10.1161/01.STR.0000052974.79428.0C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Abnet CC, Qiao YL, Dawsey SM, Dong ZW, Taylor PR, Mark SD: Tooth loss is associated with increased risk of total death and death from upper gastrointestinal cancer, heart disease, and stroke in a Chinese population-based cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2005, 34: 467-474. 10.1093/ije/dyh375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Morrison HI, Ellison LF, Taylor GW: Periodontal disease and risk of fatal coronary heart and cerebrovascular diseases. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1999, 6: 7-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Elter JR, Offenbacher S, Toole JF, Beck JD: Relationship of periodontal disease and edentulism to stroke/TIA. J Dent Res. 2003, 82: 998-1001. 10.1177/154405910308201212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee HJ, Garcia RI, Janket SJ, Jones JA, Mascarenhas AK, Scott TE, Nunn ME: The association between cumulative periodontal disease and stroke history in older adults. J Periodontol. 2006, 77: 1744-1754. 10.1902/jop.2006.050339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu T, Trevisan M, Genco RJ, Dorn JP, Falkner KL, Sempos CT: Periodontal disease and risk of cerebrovascular disease: the first national health and nutrition examination survey and its follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2000, 160: 2749-2755. 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Renvert S, Ohlsson O, Persson S, Lang NP, Persson GR: Analysis of periodontal risk profiles in adults with or without a history of myocardial infarction. J Clin Periodontol. 2004, 31: 9-24.Google Scholar
  16. Andriankaja OM, Genco RJ, Dorn J, Dmochowski J, Hovey K, Falkner KL, Scannapieco F, Trevisan M: The use of different measurements and definitions of periodontal disease in the study of the association between periodontal disease and risk of myocardial infarction. J Periodontol. 2006, 77: 1067-1073. 10.1902/jop.2006.050276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lopez R, Oyarzun M, Naranio C, Cumsille F, Ortiz M, Baelum V: Coronary heart disease and periodontitis – a case control study in Chilean adults. J Clin Periodontol. 2002, 29: 468-473. 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290513.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hujoel PP, Dragsholt M, Spiekerman C, Deroquen TA: Examining the link between coronary heart disease and the elimination of chronic dental infections. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001, 132: 883-889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshipura KJ, Douglass CW, Willett WC: Possible explanations for the tooth loss and cardiovascular disease relationship. Ann Periodontol. 1998, 3: 175-183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. DeStefano F, Anda RF, Kahn HS, Williamson DF, Russell CM: Dental disease and risk of coronary heart disease and mortality. BMJ. 1993, 306: 688-691. 10.1136/bmj.306.6879.688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Albandar JM: Epidemiology and risk factors of periodontal diseases. Dent Clin North Am. 2005, 49: 517-532. 10.1016/j.cden.2005.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chesnutt IG, Binnie VI, Taylor MM: Reasons for tooth extraction in Scotland. J Dent. 2000, 28: 295-297. 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00069-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Trovik TA, Klock KS, Haugejorden O: Trends in reasons for tooth extractions in Norway from 1968 to 1998. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000, 58: 89-96. 10.1080/000163500429343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Axelsson G, Helgadottir S: Comparison of oral health data from self-administered questionnaire and clinical examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995, 23: 365-368. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1995.tb00264.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Unell L, Soderfeldt TB, Halling A, Paulander J, Birkhed D: Oral disease, impairment, and illness: congruence between clinical and questionnaire findings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997, 55: 127-132. 10.3109/00016359709115404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartikainen S, Mantyselka P, Louhivuori-Laako K, Enlund H, Sulkava R: Concomitant use of analgesics and psychotropics in home-dwelling elderly people-Kuopio 75 + study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005, 60: 306-310. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02417.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kauppi M, Hartikainen S, Kautiainen H, Laiho K, Sulkava R: Capability for daily activities in old people with rheumatoid arthritis: a population based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005, 64: 56-58. 10.1136/ard.2003.017889.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zou G: A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 159: 702-6. 10.1093/aje/kwh090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.
  30. Smith SC, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Cerqueira MD, Dracup K, Fuster V, Gotto A, Grundy SM, Miller NH, Jacobs A, Jones D, Krauss RM, Mosca L, Ockene I, Pasternak RC, Pearson T, Pfeffer MA, Starke RD, Taubert KA: AHA/ACC Guidelines for Preventing Heart Attack and Death in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: 2001 update. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2001, 104: 1577-1579. 10.1161/hc3801.097475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Syrjälä et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.