Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Human pluripotent embryonal carcinoma NTERA2 cl.D1 cells maintain their typical morphology in an angiomyogenic medium

Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine20076:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-6-5

Received: 06 November 2006

Accepted: 18 April 2007

Published: 18 April 2007

Abstract

Background

Pluripotent embryonal carcinomas are good potential models, to study, "in vitro," the mechanisms that control differentiation during embryogenesis. The NTERA2cl.D1 (NT2/D1) cell line is a well known system of ectodermal differentiation. Retinoic acid (RA) induces a dorsal pattern of differentiation (essentially neurons) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) or hexamethylenebisacetamide (HMBA) induces a more ventral (epidermal) pattern of differentiation. However, whether these human cells could give rise to mesoderm derivatives as their counterpart in mouse remained elusive. We analyzed the morphological characteristics and transcriptional activation of genes pertinent in cardiac muscle and endothelium differentiation, during the growth of NT2/D1 cells in an inductive angiomyogenic medium with or without Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP2).

Results

Our experiments showed that NT2/D1 maintains their typical actin organization in angiomyogenic medium. Although the beta myosin heavy chain gene was never detected, all the other 15 genes analyzed maintained their expression throughout the time course of the experiment. Among them were early and late cardiac, endothelial, neuronal and teratocarcinoma genes.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that despite the NT2/D1 cells natural tendency to differentiate into neuroectodermal lineages, they can activate genes of mesodermal lineages. Therefore, we believe that these pluripotent cells might still be a good model to study biological development of mesodermal derivatives, provided the right culture conditions are met.

Background

Teratocarcinomas are highly malignant tumours, cells that have a big potential to differentiate in other cell types. They are considered to recapitulate many events occurring in early embryogenesis, but with a lesser degree of organization and regulation, being also called embryonal carcinomas (EC) [15]. The "undifferentiated elements" of these tumors are composed of EC cells or malignant pluripotent stem cells that appear, in culture, as embryoid body-like structures. After differentiation, they can also be histologically positive for many somatic tissues such as bone, muscle, nerve and others, these constituting the "differentiated elements" of these tumors or the teratoma components [6].

The NT2/D1 cell line is a human EC that does not require any feeder layer to preserve its undifferentiated potential and it may form embryoid body-like structures in vitro, a feature also observed in other EC tumours [79]. The presence of some differentiating agents as RA, in the culture medium, seems to activate the neuroectodermal differentiating program [10], where the NT2/D1 cells give rise to neural cells but also nonneural cells. However, even without this agent, NT2/D1 can originate some neuronal-like phenotypes [11].

When NT2/D1 cells give rise to neurons less than 10% of the cells adopt this phenotype, while the rest of the cells in the nonneural populations remain to be further analyzed and identified. Thus the hypothesis of mesodermal derivatives from NT2/D1 cannot be excluded [10, 12, 13]. Nonneural cells were suggested to be primarily epithelial in nature, by immunocytochemical staining, but the exact identity of such cells has never been documented [11]. It is suggested that this cell line although expressing mesodermal genes, does not adopt a mesodermal differentiation program [13]. Most authors agree that this cell line does not give rise to mesodermal derivatives; however, opposite evidence has been recently documented, in a BMP2 induced differentiation [14].

We believe that NT2/D1 might be the human counterpart of P19, a mouse teratocarcinoma cell line with cardiac differentiation potential. One of the genes highly expressed in P19, that disappears after the differentiation is finished, is Cripto [15]. This gene codes for a small cysteine-rich protein that contains an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like motif and a CRIPTO/FRL1/Cryptic (CFC) motif. CRIPTO is anchored in the cell membrane by a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol linkage where it functions as a coreceptor for Nodal, a member of the TGF-β family [16]. It can be detected in the trophoblast and in the inner cell mass of mouse blastocysts, becoming, thereafter restricted to developing myocardium. Cripto knockout is lethal in mouse and its inactivation in vivo results in the loss of detection of some cardiac transcripts, such as, alpha myosin heavy chain (α-MyHC), beta myosin heavy chain (β-MyHC), atrial myosin light chain 2 (MLC-2a), ventricular myosin light chain 2 (MLC-2v) and atrial natriuretic factor ANP [17]. In embryonic stem cells (ESCs), its loss does not affect cell commitment to the mesenchymal, endodermal or ectodermal lineage, but results also in the absence of transcription of cardiac specific genes. For all this, it has been suggested, recently, that CRIPTO is a master gene regulator in cardiomyogenesis. Expression of CRIPTO by NT2/D1 cells has been shown by Baldassarre et al. [18].

To find a human embryonic cell line that could differentiate with high frequency into myocardium and to identify the factor(s) that would lead the cells through that path, would be a powerful tool to study cardiomyogenesis, in vitro.

Here, we have studied the cell morphology and the transcription profile of the NT2/D1 cells cultured for 30 days with and without BMP2. The gene expression analyzed was particularly focused on EC, endothelial, neural progenitors and early and late cardiac differentiation genes. An angiomyogenic medium was tested as differentiation culture medium.

Results

Morphological analysis

The typical NT2/D1 morphological characteristics, as the increase in nuclear/cytoplasm volume ratio, the flattening of the cells, the prominent nucleoli (Figure 1), the polymerized actin organization (phalloidin staining) and ultrastructural analysis were used as the morphological criteria to monitor cell differentiation.
Figure 1

NT2/D1 cells in expansion medium. Phase contrast images of three typical morphologies of NT2/D1 cells in expansion medium, (RPMI, FBS and antibiotics) analyzed in a CK2 Olympus microscope: A. Embryoid body-like structures, magnification 40×; B. epithelioid-like phenotype, magnification 100×; C. neuronal-like phenotype, magnification 200×.

As can be seen in figure 2, after 20 days in culture, in control as well as in IAM medium, NT2/D1 cells can form many embryonic (white arrows) body-like structures, surrounded by an epithelioid squamous layer of adherent flattened cells, resembling a visceral endoderm phenotype [19] with the interesting fact of presenting many vilosities. When in an overconfluency state, many structures present some similarities with an endothelial angiogenic network. In contrast, neuronal-like cells could not be seen, indicating a possible inhibition of that phenotype with 20% FBS or in IAM. Also, no muscular structures were ever detected during the time course of the experiment.
Figure 2

NT2/D1 cells in IAM medium. Cell culture images of NT2/D1 cells after 20 days growing in control, IAM and IAM+BMP2 medium. All the non fluorescent and fluorescent images are 100× magnified and analyzed in a CK2 and BX50 Olympus microscope, respectively. Ultrastructural images have a scale bar in the bottom right corner. NT2/D1 cells formed many embryonic body-like structures (white arrows), surrounded by an epithelioid squamous layer of adherent flattened cells. Desmosomes can be seen between adjacent cells (TEM black arrow). To see non fluorescent and fluorescent images of days 1, 5, 10 and 30, please [see Additional file 4].

Ultrastructural analysis

As mentioned above, some villosities could be detected in TEM (figure 2, TEM, control). This finding is consistent with the tendency that the NT2/D1 cells have to differentiate through an epithelial path. Desmosomes are visible between adjacent cells (figure 2, black arrow), which would be consistent with a muscular phenotype, however, specific morphologies of the latter tissue, like sarcomeres, were not ever found, [see Additional file 1].

Transcriptional analysis

To see if would be any tendency of NT2/D1 to differentiate in a more muscle related or endothelial related fashion, genes specific for that tissues were chosen, ([see Additional file 2] and Figure 3):
Figure 3

Expression studies. Polaroid images of 0,8% agarose gels with Ethidium Bromide of polymerase amplified gene products of NT2/D1 cells cDNA. In the first and last lanes one can see the 1 Kb ladder (Invitrogen). To see gel images of the days 1, 5, 10 and 30, or other details related to the amplified products and primers, please [see Additional file 4].

Muscle related genes

At all time points analyzed, NT2/D1 cells expressed undifferentiated cardiac specific genes, like GATA4, CSX1 and MEF2D, as well as differentiated cardiac specific genes as VLC1 and VLC2. The slow muscle myosin heavy chain gene (MYH7), found in cardiac but also in some skeletal muscles, was the sole gene, of those analyzed that was not detect in this study. Although the primers for the MYH7 were specific for this gene, the bands that were found were nonspecific products of the polymerase reaction, giving rise to a specific pattern of expression in the particular cell line tested. Curiously, non muscular tissues also gave rise to nonspecific products with the specific MYH7 primers, [see Additional file 3].

Endothelial progenitor related genes

Transcripts of CD133 and the VEGF receptor 2, KDR, could be detected at all time points of the experiment. This finding could reflect the angiogenic potential of these cells [20, 21]. In fact, there are some images in the differentiation cultures that remind angiogenic like networks, but further studies are obviously needed to prove this concept.

Other progenitor related genes

Knowing that NT2/D1 expresses the CD133 and that these cells easily undergo neural differentiation, we would expect to detect expression of NESTIN [22, 23]. That was indeed the case. NESTIN expression was detected from the first day of the experiment. On the other hand, the expression of FLT1 indicated that these cells could be considered not only endothelial but also haematopoietic progenitor cells as described by others [24, 25].

Bone morphogenetic protein receptors (BMPRs)

Because one of our main hypothesis was that BMP2 was an inducer of mesodermal differentiation in NT2/D1 cultures, we analyzed whether the main BMP receptor genes, namely BMPRIA, BMPRIB and BMPRII [26, 27] were transcriptionally active. Type II receptors can bind ligands in the absence of type I receptors, but they need their respective type I receptors to transduce the signal [28, 29]. BMPRIA, BMPRIB and BMPRII transcripts could be detected in the 5 time points of the experiment. Interestingly, the heavy isoform of BMPRIB was only detected after 30 days in the angiomyogenic medium. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains to bee clarified.

NT2/D1 related genes

H19 is a gene that is expressed in a vast number of organs during fetal development. In adults, however, expression is confined to lung, thymus, skeletal and cardiac muscle [30]. Accordingly, in EC cells it is expressed after induction of differentiation [15, 3033]. Our experiments showed that NT2/D1 expressed H19 throughout the time course of the experiment, [see Additional file 4].

As mentioned before, one of the genes highly expressed in P19 cells, a murine EC, with cardiac differentiation potential is Cripto, that disappears after the differentiation is finished [15]. As expected, we detect in the NT2/D1 cell line relative good levels of CRIPTO expression that changed to a more unspecific pattern in the last days of the experiment, suggesting that NT2/D1 had differentiated [18]. The expected band for CRIPTO was 1199 bp. So, the significance of the several unexpected bands that have appeared in NT2/D1 after some days in culture remains to be clarified, [see Additional file 4]. This similarity between P19 and NT2/D1 cells supported our initial hypothesis, that in the appropriate conditions, NT2/D1 cells could give rise to mesodermal derivatives, such as skeletal or cardiac muscle.

Discussion

Despite the difference of human and mouse EC at the level of cell surface markers, they share some common characteristics, such as, the morphology of little cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli and the preferential clustering growth pattern. In this line of thought, one can say that the mouse teratocarcinoma cell line, P19, has a relevant similar behavior to NT2/D1, also, regarding the potential of both to originate neuroectodermal derivatives in the presence of retinoic acid.

However, in the presence of RA P19 cells can still give rise to mesodermal derivatives, such as, smooth muscle, skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle [34, 35]. The last two processes, can be also induced by dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) [36] and the cardiac differentiation inhibited by noggin [37], a BMP2 antagonist, indicates that probably, this growth factor is essential in this inductive process.

BMP2, belonging to the transforming growth factor superfamily, is involved in many important processes in early human and mouse development [19, 3843] and have a variety of effects in human and mouse teratocarcinomas. It can induce epithelial differentiation in NT2/D1 [44] and endodermal differentiation in GCT27X-1 EC and human ESCs [19, 45], however in P19 cells it can give rise also to mesodermal derivatives like cardiac muscle [37]. Contrarily to human ESCs, treatment of mouse ESCs with BMP2 and/or FGF2 efficiently enhanced cardiomyogenesis [46].

For this, BMP2 has been considered to be an inhibitor of the neural differentiation program and an embryonic ectoderm [11] or extra-embryonic endoderm epidermal inducer in human pluripotent stem cells [19], but also a mesodermal inducer in the mouse pluripotent stem cells [47]. Only recently, has the latter role been documented [14], in humans.

We also believe that BMP2 can indirectly induce NT2/D1 cells into mesodermal derivatives like cardiac muscle, because: 1) observations from amphibians, chicks and more recently from mice, have proposed that the factors produced by embryonic endoderm are good candidates to be cardiogenic inducers [48]; 2) BMPs, as BMP2, have a role in visceral endoderm differentiation in the mouse [49] and in the human ESCs system [50]; 3) the mouse P19CL6noggin EC cell line that overexpresses the BMP2 antagonist noggin and has lost it potential to differentiate into cardiomyocytes, can regain that property when in the presence of excess BMP2 protein [37]; 4) recently, it has been shown that the mouse visceral endoderm-like cell line END2, derived from P19 EC, when cocultured with the parental cells [51] or mouse ESCs [52] induces spontaneous aggregation and differentiation into cardiac muscle, in the absence of BMP2. The same effect could be obtained with END2 conditioned medium [52]. Curiously, in humans one can also obtain cardiomyocytes by coculturing human ESCs with mouse END2 [52, 53]. The latter findings indicate that the visceral endoderm-like cells and not the BMP2, are the primary key for myocardial differentiation. Apparently, END2 cells produce one or more factors that promote cardiac differentiation.

Hence, one can say that the main potential of P19 cells to spontaneously differentiate into cardiac derivatives may come from the factors produced by the cells that undergone the visceral endoderm-like differentiation, thus, inducing other cells to the mesodermal lineage. So, we speculate that when the BMP2 is present it may contribute indirectly to cardiomyogenesis by increasing the number of visceral endoderm like cells in culture.

Then, if BMP2 can inhibit the neural fate and induce the mesodermal and the visceral endoderm-like phenotype in NT2/D1 cells it would possibly induce some cells to the cardiac lineage too. Unfortunately, morphological signals of muscle differentiation as myotube formation and sarcomeric intracellular actin organization were not detected, in an angiomyogenic inductive medium, in the presence of BMP2 or in 5-Aza treated cells, as we did not see any muscle beating areas at all the time points of the experiment, indicating that the NT2/D1 were not committed to mesodermal lineages like striated muscle, but instead, they differentiate mainly into the expected epithelioid morphologies. There were some cultures that exhibit some angiomyogenic like structures, but further studies are needed to confirm that.

However, transcripts from the cardiomyogenic (VLC1, VLC2, MEF2D, GATA4 and CSX1) and endothelial (KDR and CD133) mesodermal lineages, bone morphogenetic protein receptors (BMPRIA, BMPRIB and BMPRII) and NT2/D1 specific were detected in a qualitative and constitutive manner during the time course of the experiment.

CRIPTO, a suggested master gene regulator in cardiogenesis, is one of the genes highly expressed in cardiomyogenic P19 cells. Accordingly, we detect in the NT2/D1 cell line good levels of CRIPTO expression, strengthening our initial hypothesis, that in appropriate conditions, NT2/D1 cells can possibly give rise to mesodermal derivatives, such as cardiac muscle. During the time course of the experiment, CRIPTO transcripts tended to become more difficult to visualize while H19 transcripts more easy to detect, a signal that NT2/D1 were differentiating, at least regarding this genes, in a similar manner as their mouse counterpart P19.

Conclusion

We believe that the apparent blockage of the differentiation pathways in vitro through a mesodermal commitment may reside on unknown pos-transcriptional or pos-translational mechanisms.

Another possibility is that the aneuploid state of NT2/D1 cells inhibits the key differentiating genes, and that what was once an advantage, regarding the tumor clonal selection of differentiation-resistant cells, is now a relevant obstacle in differentiation studies like this one.

Still, identifying the factors capable of regulating differentiation of pluripotent human EC cell lines, will give us clues for as to how manipulate human stem cells, an important raw material for in vitro generation of tissues for transplantation therapy.

Methods

Cell culture

NT2/D1 cells (Stratagene) were cultured and expanded in 80 cm2 flasks in RPMI 1640 medium without Glutamine (Invitrogen), with 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen), 20 μM 2-β-Mercaptoetanol (Sigma), 2 mM Glutamine (Invitrogen) 10% FBS (Invitrogen) and 1% (v/v) Penicillin 10000 IU/ml + Streptomycin 10 mg/ml (Invitrogen) and left for growth to 80% confluence, harvested by scraping and reseeded 1:4, continuously until they were needed.

In angiomyogenic induction, NT2/D1 cells were suspended in inductive angiomyogenic medium (IAM) with endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS) as described by Shmelkov et al [54]: Briefly, cells were cultured in M199 Medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20% FBS (Invitrogen), 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen), 1 U Heparin (Sigma), 1% (v/v) Penicillin 10000 IU/ml + Streptomycin 10 mg/ml (Invitrogen), 10 ng/ml VEGF (Sigma), 5 ng/ml bFGF (Sigma), 50 ng/ml BDNF (Invitrogen) and 150 μg/ml ECGS and seeded at 1000 cells/cm2 on glass or thermanox coverslips coated with 2% gelatin, in 24-well dishes. The seeded cells were left for the first 24 h in 10 μM 5-Azacytidine and then washed and resuspended in the same initial medium. BMP2, at the concentration of 100 ng/ml, was added to IAM (IAM+BMP2). Medium without VEGF, bFGF, BDNF and ECGS was used as control (Control). Cells were harvested on day 1, 5, 10, 20 and 30 after initiation of culture and used for histological, ultrastructural and RT-PCR analysis.

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Analysis

Total RNA was extracted according to Trizol total RNA extraction protocol (Invitrogen). cDNA first strand synthesis was performed on 1 μg total RNA, by using the ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen) with an oligo dT primer. As a second step, cDNA samples were subjected to PCR amplification, in a separate tube, using primers specific for the gene of interest, [see Additional files 5 and 6], with the Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen) using 40 cycles at 56°C. For each gene, the DNA primers were derived from different exons, allowing the distinction between cDNA and contaminating genomic DNA amplifications. Primers were synthesized for the following human genes: ACTB, VLC1, VLC2, MYH7, CSX1, GATA4, MEF2D, BMPRIA, CRIPTO, H19, Nestin, FLT1, CD133, KDR, BMPRIB, and BMPRII.

Histochemistry

Glass coverslips, containing the NT2/D1 cells, were fixed for 30 min with the addition of buffered formaldehyde pH 7.0 into the cell culture wells at a 2% final concentration, washed in D-PBS pH 7,2–7,4 (Invitrogen) and stored at 4°C until processed. When processed, coverslips were washed in water, immersed in Harris's hematoxylin (Merck) for 10 minutes, washed in water, differentiated in 70% EtOH with 1% HCl for 10 seconds, immersed in eosin Y (Merck) for 10 seconds and washed again. Stained cells in coverslips were dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, followed by xylol (Merck), and mounted on glass microscope slides, cell side down, using entellan (Merck).

Phalloidin staining

Dilution of phalloidin-TRITC stock solution (Sigma) and washing of the glass coverslips were performed in D-PBS pH 7,2–7,4 containing 0,05% saponin (Sigma). Coverslips were fixed for 30 min with the addition of buffered formaldehyde pH 7.0 into the cell culture wells at a 2% final concentration, incubated with 1 μg/ml phalloidin-TRITC solution for 90 min at RT and washed 3 times. The coverslips were then mounted on microscope slides, cell side down, using Glicerol:D-PBS (1:1) and visualized in a Olympus BX50 microscope.

Ultrastructural analysis

Thermanox coverslips (Nunc) from day 20, were fixed in 0,1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (EMS) pH 7,3 with 3% gluteraldeyde (EMS) for 1 h, washed in 0,1 M sodium cacodylate, followed by 1% osmium tetroxide (EMS) in the same buffer for 1 h and washed again, first in cacodylate buffer and then in 0,1 M sodium acetate buffer (Merck) pH 5,0. Fixed cells were incubated with 1% uranyl acetate (EMS) in 0,1 M sodium acetate buffer pH 5,0 for 1 h, washed in the same buffer, dehydrated in graded series of ethanol, followed by propylene oxide (EMS), embedded in epon (EMS) and left for 3 days at 70°C. Thin sections cut on a LKB III microtome with a diamond knife for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were stained on 300 mesh square copper grids with 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Fluka) and observed in a Philips CN10 transmission electron microscope. All the steps were made at room temperature, except when otherwise documented.

Sequencing

The PCR products were purified using Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Quiagen) as described by the manufacturer and visualized by ethidium bromide after electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. A molecular weight standard a 1 kb DNA ladder (Invitrogen,) was used. All sequences were determined in an automated DNA capillary sequencer CEQ 2000-XL (Beckman Coulter, USA, in ICAT – Lisbon Faculty of Sciences Sequencing Services) by a dye-labeled dideoxy termination method (DTCS, Dye Terminator Cycle sequencer start kit, Beckman Coulter). Two sequencing reactions were performed using the two primers used for PCR amplification. The sequences obtained, were compared with existing gene data from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (GenBank) for all the amplified genes. All the primers have given rise to the expected amplified fragments.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank to Professor Jorge Leitão from Instituto de Tecnologia Biomédica for the kind availability and facilities that were always at our disposal, to Doutor Sérgio Dias from Centro de Investigação de Patologia Molecular (CIPM) and Doutor Moura Nunes from Electronic Miscroscopy Department, both in the Oncology Portuguese Institute, for their assistance in the differentiation procedures and TEM imaging, respectively. To Filomena Aparício da Cruz from Dental School of Lisbon for her kind assistance in the histochemical procedures.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Tecnologia Biomédica, Laboratório de Biomateriais, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa, Cidade Universitária

References

  1. Skotheim RI, Lind GE, Monni O, Nesland JM, Abeler VM, Fossa SD, Duale N, Brunborg G, Kallioniemi O, Andrews PW, Lothe RA: Differentiation of human embryonal carcinomas in vitro and in vivo reveals expression profiles relevant to normal development. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (13): 5588-5598. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews PW, Matin MM, Bahrami AR, Damjanov I, Gokhale P, Draper JS: Embryonic stem (ES) cells and embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells: opposite sides of the same coin. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005, 33 (Pt 6): 1526-1530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Almstrup K, Hoei-Hansen CE, Wirkner U, Blake J, Schwager C, Ansorge W, Nielsen JE, Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Leffers H: Embryonic stem cell-like features of testicular carcinoma in situ revealed by genome-wide gene expression profiling. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (14): 4736-4743. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Walsh J, Andrews PW: Expression of Wnt and Notch pathway genes in a pluripotent human embryonal carcinoma cell line and embryonic stem cell. Apmis. 2003, 111 (1): 197-210; discussion 210-1. 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2003.1110124.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews PW: Human teratocarcinomas. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988, 948 (1): 17-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews PW: From teratocarcinomas to embryonic stem cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002, 357 (1420): 405-417. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1058.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Parchment RE, Gramzinski RA, Pierce GB: Neoplastic embryoid bodies of embryonal carcinoma C44 as a source of blastocele-like fluid. Differentiation. 1990, 43 (1): 51-58. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1990.tb00429.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Soprano DR, Soprano KJ, Wyatt ML, Goodman DS: Induction of the expression of retinol-binding protein and transthyretin in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells differentiated to embryoid bodies. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263 (34): 17897-17900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Takeuchi K, Watanabe T, Uno K: Nucleolus-like bodies in embryonal carcinoma cells of the embryoid bodies isolated from mouse teratocarcinoma. Exp Cell Res. 1983, 143 (2): 467-471. 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90075-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrews PW: Retinoic acid induces neuronal differentiation of a cloned human embryonal carcinoma cell line in vitro. Dev Biol. 1984, 103 (2): 285-293. 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90316-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Przyborski SA, Christie VB, Hayman MW, Stewart R, Horrocks GM: Human embryonal carcinoma stem cells: models of embryonic development in humans. Stem Cells Dev. 2004, 13 (4): 400-408. 10.1089/scd.2004.13.400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Pleasure SJ, Page C, Lee VM: Pure, postmitotic, polarized human neurons derived from NTera 2 cells provide a system for expressing exogenous proteins in terminally differentiated neurons. J Neurosci. 1992, 12 (5): 1802-1815.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gokhale PJ, Giesberts AM, Andrews PW: Brachyury is expressed by human teratocarcinoma cells in the absence of mesodermal differentiation. Cell Growth Differ. 2000, 11 (3): 157-162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chadalavada RS, Houldsworth J, Olshen AB, Bosl GJ, Studer L, Chaganti RS: Transcriptional program of bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced epithelial and smooth muscle differentiation of pluripotent human embryonal carcinoma cells. Funct Integr Genomics. 2005, 5 (2): 59-69. 10.1007/s10142-005-0132-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Boheler KR, Czyz J, Tweedie D, Yang HT, Anisimov SV, Wobus AM: Differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2002, 91 (3): 189-201. 10.1161/01.RES.0000027865.61704.32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shen MM: Decrypting the role of Cripto in tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2003, 112 (4): 500-502. 10.1172/JCI200319546.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu C, Liguori G, Persico MG, Adamson ED: Abrogation of the Cripto gene in mouse leads to failure of postgastrulation morphogenesis and lack of differentiation of cardiomyocytes. Development. 1999, 126 (3): 483-494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baldassarre G, Romano A, Armenante F, Rambaldi M, Paoletti I, Sandomenico C, Pepe S, Staibano S, Salvatore G, De Rosa G, Persico MG, Viglietto G: Expression of teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor-1 (TDGF-1) in testis germ cell tumors and its effects on growth and differentiation of embryonal carcinoma cell line NTERA2/D1. Oncogene. 1997, 15 (8): 927-936. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pera MF, Andrade J, Houssami S, Reubinoff B, Trounson A, Stanley EG, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Mummery C: Regulation of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by BMP-2 and its antagonist noggin. J Cell Sci. 2004, 117 (Pt 7): 1269-1280. 10.1242/jcs.00970.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, Zhu Z, Lane WJ, Williams M, Oz MC, Hicklin DJ, Witte L, Moore MA, Rafii S: Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood. 2000, 95 (3): 952-958.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamashita J, Itoh H, Hirashima M, Ogawa M, Nishikawa S, Yurugi T, Naito M, Nakao K: Flk1-positive cells derived from embryonic stem cells serve as vascular progenitors. Nature. 2000, 408 (6808): 92-96. 10.1038/35040568.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, Reitsma MJ, Masek M, Phan TV, Tsukamoto AS, Gage FH, Weissman IL: Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97 (26): 14720-14725. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14720.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz PH, Bryant PJ, Fuja TJ, Su H, O'Dowd DK, Klassen H: Isolation and characterization of neural progenitor cells from post-mortem human cortex. J Neurosci Res. 2003, 74 (6): 838-851. 10.1002/jnr.10854.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hattori K, Heissig B, Wu Y, Dias S, Tejada R, Ferris B, Hicklin DJ, Zhu Z, Bohlen P, Witte L, Hendrikx J, Hackett NR, Crystal RG, Moore MA, Werb Z, Lyden D, Rafii S: Placental growth factor reconstitutes hematopoiesis by recruiting VEGFR1(+) stem cells from bone-marrow microenvironment. Nat Med. 2002, 8 (8): 841-849.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Luttun A, Tjwa M, Moons L, Wu Y, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Liao F, Nagy JA, Hooper A, Priller J, De Klerck B, Compernolle V, Daci E, Bohlen P, Dewerchin M, Herbert JM, Fava R, Matthys P, Carmeliet G, Collen D, Dvorak HF, Hicklin DJ, Carmeliet P: Revascularization of ischemic tissues by PlGF treatment, and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, arthritis and atherosclerosis by anti-Flt1. Nat Med. 2002, 8 (8): 831-840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yamashita H, Ten Dijke P, Heldin CH, Miyazono K: Bone morphogenetic protein receptors. Bone. 1996, 19 (6): 569-574. 10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00259-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Astrom AK, Jin D, Imamura T, Roijer E, Rosenzweig B, Miyazono K, ten Dijke P, Stenman G: Chromosomal localization of three human genes encoding bone morphogenetic protein receptors. Mamm Genome. 1999, 10 (3): 299-302. 10.1007/s003359900990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenzweig BL, Imamura T, Okadome T, Cox GN, Yamashita H, ten Dijke P, Heldin CH, Miyazono K: Cloning and characterization of a human type II receptor for bone morphogenetic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92 (17): 7632-7636. 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7632.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Nohe A, Keating E, Knaus P, Petersen NO: Signal transduction of bone morphogenetic protein receptors. Cell Signal. 2004, 16 (3): 291-299. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2003.08.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Looijenga LH, Verkerk AJ, De Groot N, Hochberg AA, Oosterhuis JW: H19 in normal development and neoplasia. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997, 46 (3): 419-439. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199703)46:3<419::AID-MRD22>3.0.CO;2-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Leibovitch MP, Nguyen VC, Gross MS, Solhonne B, Leibovitch SA, Bernheim A: The human ASM (adult skeletal muscle) gene: expression and chromosomal assignment to 11p15. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991, 180 (3): 1241-1250. 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81329-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurst LD, Smith NG: Molecular evolutionary evidence that H19 mRNA is functional. Trends Genet. 1999, 15 (4): 134-135. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01696-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoo-Warren H, Pachnis V, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM: Two regulatory domains flank the mouse H19 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1988, 8 (11): 4707-4715.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Spin JM, Nallamshetty S, Tabibiazar R, Ashley EA, King JY, Chen M, Tsao PS, Quertermous T: Transcriptional profiling of in vitro smooth muscle cell differentiation identifies specific patterns of gene and pathway activation. Physiol Genomics. 2004, 19 (3): 292-302. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00148.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Edwards MK, McBurney MW: The concentration of retinoic acid determines the differentiated cell types formed by a teratocarcinoma cell line. Dev Biol. 1983, 98 (1): 187-191. 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90348-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McBurney MW, Jones-Villeneuve EM, Edwards MK, Anderson PJ: Control of muscle and neuronal differentiation in a cultured embryonal carcinoma cell line. Nature. 1982, 299 (5879): 165-167. 10.1038/299165a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Monzen K, Shiojima I, Hiroi Y, Kudoh S, Oka T, Takimoto E, Hayashi D, Hosoda T, Habara-Ohkubo A, Nakaoka T, Fujita T, Yazaki Y, Komuro I: Bone morphogenetic proteins induce cardiomyocyte differentiation through the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase TAK1 and cardiac transcription factors Csx/Nkx-2.5 and GATA-4. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19 (10): 7096-7105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Ying Y, Zhao GQ: Cooperation of endoderm-derived BMP2 and extraembryonic ectoderm-derived BMP4 in primordial germ cell generation in the mouse. Dev Biol. 2001, 232 (2): 484-492. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lough J, Barron M, Brogley M, Sugi Y, Bolender DL, Zhu X: Combined BMP-2 and FGF-4, but neither factor alone, induces cardiogenesis in non-precardiac embryonic mesoderm. Dev Biol. 1996, 178 (1): 198-202. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang J, Li L: BMP signaling and stem cell regulation. Dev Biol. 2005, 284 (1): 1-11. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakashima K, Takizawa T, Ochiai W, Yanagisawa M, Hisatsune T, Nakafuku M, Miyazono K, Kishimoto T, Kageyama R, Taga T: BMP2-mediated alteration in the developmental pathway of fetal mouse brain cells from neurogenesis to astrocytogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (10): 5868-5873. 10.1073/pnas.101109698.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Maguer-Satta V, Bartholin L, Jeanpierre S, Ffrench M, Martel S, Magaud JP, Rimokh R: Regulation of human erythropoiesis by activin A, BMP2, and BMP4, members of the TGFbeta family. Exp Cell Res. 2003, 282 (2): 110-120. 10.1016/S0014-4827(02)00013-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ma L, Lu MF, Schwartz RJ, Martin JF: Bmp2 is essential for cardiac cushion epithelial-mesenchymal transition and myocardial patterning. Development. 2005, 132 (24): 5601-5611. 10.1242/dev.02156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Caricasole A, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Zeinstra L, van den Eijnden-van Raaij A, Mummery C: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) induce epithelial differentiation of NT2D1 human embryonal carcinoma cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2000, 44 (5): 443-450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pera MF, Herszfeld D: Differentiation of human pluripotent teratocarcinoma stem cells induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998, 10 (7-8): 551-555. 10.1071/RD98097.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kawai T, Takahashi T, Esaki M, Ushikoshi H, Nagano S, Fujiwara H, Kosai K: Efficient cardiomyogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cell by fibroblast growth factor 2 and bone morphogenetic protein 2. Circ J. 2004, 68 (7): 691-702. 10.1253/circj.68.691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kimelman D: Mesoderm induction: from caps to chips. Nat Rev Genet. 2006, 7 (5): 360-372. 10.1038/nrg1837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lev S, Kehat I, Gepstein L: Differentiation pathways in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005, 1047: 50-65. 10.1196/annals.1341.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Coucouvanis E, Martin GR: BMP signaling plays a role in visceral endoderm differentiation and cavitation in the early mouse embryo. Development. 1999, 126 (3): 535-546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Keller G: Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 2005, 19 (10): 1129-1155. 10.1101/gad.1303605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mummery CL, van Achterberg TA, van den Eijnden-van Raaij AJ, van Haaster L, Willemse A, de Laat SW, Piersma AH: Visceral-endoderm-like cell lines induce differentiation of murine P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Differentiation. 1991, 46 (1): 51-60. 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1991.tb00865.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mummery C, Ward D, van den Brink CE, Bird SD, Doevendans PA, Opthof T, Brutel de la Riviere A, Tertoolen L, van der Heyden M, Pera M: Cardiomyocyte differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells. J Anat. 2002, 200 (Pt 3): 233-242. 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00031.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Mummery C, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Doevendans P, Spijker R, van den Brink S, Hassink R, van der Heyden M, Opthof T, Pera M, de la Riviere AB, Passier R, Tertoolen L: Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation. 2003, 107 (21): 2733-2740. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068356.38592.68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Shmelkov SV, Meeus S, Moussazadeh N, Kermani P, Rashbaum WK, Rabbany SY, Hanson MA, Lane WJ, St Clair R, Walsh KA, Dias S, Jacobson JT, Hempstead BL, Edelberg JM, Rafii S: Cytokine preconditioning promotes codifferentiation of human fetal liver CD133+ stem cells into angiomyogenic tissue. Circulation. 2005, 111 (9): 1175-1183. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157155.44008.0F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Simões and Ramos; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement