Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators"

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jul 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Molimard
27 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marco Mura
15 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Kamal Chaouachi
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Kamal Chaouachi
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Kamal Chaouachi
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Nov 2006 Editorially accepted
17 Nov 2006 Article published 10.1186/1477-5751-5-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement