Skip to main content

Table 1 2D:4D index vs. background and occupational variables: relation between the 2D:4D index and categorical variables (t-test or ANOVA) and between 2D:4D index and continuous variables (Pearson's correlation).

From: Radiographic 2D:4D index in females: no relation to anthropometric, behavioural, nutritional, health-related, occupational or fertility variables

Variable (- categories)

Number

2D:4D

Correlation coefficient

p-value (crude)

p-value (adjusted)

Background data

     

Age

490

 

0.008

0.868

0.811

Stature

490

 

0.009

0.847

0.927

Body mass index (kg/m2)

489

 

-0.050

0.273

0.314

Hand dominancy

   

0.898

0.949

-right hand

451

0.925

   

-left or both hands

39

0.924

   

Marital status

   

0.374

0.341

-single

42

0.924

   

-married

366

0.924

   

-divorced

66

0.928

   

-widow

16

0.932

   

Number of pregnancies

489

 

0.006

0.888

0.942

Smoked years (number)

490

 

-0.019

0.668

0.655

Alcohol consumption index

  

-0.039

0.383

0.367

Occupational data

     

Occupation

   

0.679

0.693

-dentists

271

0.924

   

-teachers

219

0.925

   

Dentists' education

   

0.663

0.870

-general practitioner

217

0.925

   

-specialist

54

0.924

   

Working status

   

0.099

0.138

-currently working

462

0.925

   

-retired

10

0.911

   

-stopped to work

18

0.927

   

Part time retirement

   

0.728

0.941

-no

468

0.925

   

-yes

22

0.923

   

Weekly working hours

490

 

0.018

0.684

0.689

Karasek score (Karasek et al. 1998)

     

-job control

486

 

-0.038

0.404

0.350

-job demand

486

 

-0.037

0.421

0.414

  1. Adjusted p-values controlled for the shortening effect of osteoarthrotic changes in the second and fourth fingers (analysis of covariance or partial correlation). Number = number of patients in uncontrolled analysis