Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Antimicrobial activity of HL-60 cells compared to primary blood-derived neutrophils against Staphylococcus aureus

  • Ragheda Yaseen1,
  • Stefanie Blodkamp1,
  • Petra Lüthje1, 2,
  • Friederike Reuner1,
  • Lena Völlger1,
  • Hassan Y. Naim1 and
  • Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede1, 3Email author
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine201716:2

DOI: 10.1186/s12952-017-0067-2

Received: 12 August 2016

Accepted: 26 January 2017

Published: 19 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
12 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Munoz
30 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Udo Gaipl
14 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ragheda Yaseen
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12952-017-0067-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physiological Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
Research Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses (RIZ), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover