Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Host factors do not influence the colonization or infection by fluconazole resistant Candida species in hospitalized patients

  • Yun-Liang Yang1,
  • Ming-Fang Cheng2, 3,
  • Ya-Wen Chang4,
  • Tzuu-Guang Young5,
  • Hsin Chi6,
  • Sai Cheong Lee7,
  • Bruno Man-Hon Cheung8,
  • Fan-Chen Tseng4,
  • Tun-Chieh Chen9,
  • Yu-Huai Ho10,
  • Zhi-Yuan Shi11,
  • Chung-Huang Hubert Chan12,
  • Ju-Yu Lin4 and
  • Hsiu-Jung Lo4Email author
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine20087:12

DOI: 10.1186/1477-5751-7-12

Received: 19 September 2008

Accepted: 16 December 2008

Published: 16 December 2008

Abstract

Nosocomial yeast infections have significantly increased during the past two decades in industrialized countries, including Taiwan. This has been associated with the emergence of resistance to fluconazole and other antifungal drugs. The medical records of 88 patients, colonized or infected with Candida species, from nine of the 22 hospitals that provided clinical isolates to the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Yeasts (TSARY) program in 1999 were reviewed. A total of 35 patients contributed fluconazole resistant strains [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) 64 mg/l], while the remaining 53 patients contributed susceptible ones (MICs 8 mg/l). Fluconazole resistance was more frequent among isolates of Candida tropicalis (46.5%) than either C. albicans (36.8%) or C. glabrata (30.8%). There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics or underlying diseases among patients contributing strains different in drug susceptibility.

Background

Nosocomial infections caused by yeasts have increased significantly in the past two decades in Taiwan as well as other industrialized countries [14]. Infections by Candida species are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The increase in the prevalence of fungal infections is closely associated with invasive medical procedures and the intense use of antibiotics in high-risk patients [5, 6]. Resistance to antifungals has emerged in association with the increased use of these drugs [79].

The Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Yeasts (TSARY) program was first implemented by the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) in 1999 to prospectively assess the magnitude of the problem of yeast infection and drug resistance. Clinical isolates of yeasts were obtained from 22 geographically representative hospitals in Taiwan. Emergence of fluconazole resistant Candida species was documented in 1999 shortly after the surveillance program was instituted [911]. The survey revealed that 8.4% of the collected 632 clinical isolates were resistant [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 64 mg/l] to fluconazole [12]. Furthermore, there is an association between the rate of fluconazole resistance and the number of non-albicans Candida species collected from different regions and hospital types [13, 14]. This study was a follow-up, designed to determine whether intrinsic host factors of patients might influence the frequency of colonization or infection by fluconazole resistant strains.

Methods

Subjects

Yeast isolates were collected as described [15] from the 22 hospitals participating in TSARY in 1999. In principle, only one isolate was accepted from each patient. The number of clinical isolates with MICs 64 mg/l contributed from each hospital participating in TSARY program in 1999 ranging from none to ten [13, 16]. Therefore, we chose hospitals contributed at least three clinical isolates with MICs 64 mg/l for this study. In total, there were 40 isolates with MICs 64 mg/l from nine chosen hospitals. However, medical information of five patients was not available. Thus, we have reviewed all 35 available ones. Patients with resistant strains were matched at a ratio of about 1:2 with those with susceptible strains according to the body sites from which the yeasts were isolated in the same hospital. Each hospital contributed from 7 to 21 patients into the study. Clinical data were recorded on standardized forms and analyzed according to demographic characteristics, hospital unit, duration of stay, predisposing factors, antimicrobial therapy, underlying illnesses, and laboratory findings. The definition of diabetes, hypertension, pulmonary diseases, bacterial infection, antifungal, antibiotics, antituberculous agents, dialysis, catheter insertion, and mobility affected were recorded when the Candida species were isolated. The outcome (mortality) was documented within three months after those stains were isolated. The protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the National Health Research Institutes.

Susceptibility tests

The MICs to fluconazole were determined according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing [12]. The RPMI medium 1640 (31800-022) provided by Gibco BRL was used for the testing. Strains from American Type Culture Collection including Candida albicans (ATCC 90028), Candida krusei (ATCC 6258), and Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used as the standard controls. The final growth of each isolate was measured by Biotrak II plate reader (Amershan Biosciences, Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge England) after incubated at 35°C for 48 hours. The MICs of fluconazole were defined as the minimum inhibitory concentrations of drugs capable of reducing the turbidity of cells to greater than 50%. Isolates with MIC 64 mg/l were considered to be resistant, whereas those with MIC 8 mg/l were susceptible. Isolates with MICs falling in between (16 – 32 mg/l) were susceptible-dose dependent.

Statistical analysis

The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used for categorical variables. The Student T-test was used for continuous variables. Logistic regression was used to assess the independent effect of factors that were significant in the univariate analysis or were important to the association of interest. A probability (P) < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 35 patients from nine hospitals were selected and each one of them has contributed one clinical fluconazole resistant isolate. As a comparison, we have also reviewed 53 patients contributing susceptible isolates (with MICs 8 mg/l) from the same nine hospitals. Of the 88 isolates, there were three Candida species and their distribution in relation to the susceptibility to fluconazole is shown in Table 1. It shows that fluconazole resistance was found to be more frequent in C. tropicalis than either C. albicans or C. glabrata. The distribution of body sites from which the yeasts were isolated is shown in Table 2. Most isolates were from urine (52.3%) and sputum (23.9%) and candidemia was diagnosed in six patients (6.8%). Both C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were isolated more frequently from the urine than C. albicans (61.5% vs. 60.5% vs. 21.0%, respectively), whereas C. albicans was dominant in sputum than C. glabrata or C. tropicalis (47.4% vs. 15.4% vs. 18.6%, respectively).
Table 1

Distribution of fluconazole susceptibilities among Candida species isolated from patients in the nine hospitals

 

C. albicans

C. glabrata

C. tropicalis

Total

MIC (mg/l)

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

Number

%

64

7

36.8

8

30.8

20

46.5

35

39.8

8

12

63.2

18

69.2

23

53.5

53

60.2

Total

19

100

26

100

43

100

88

100

MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.

Table 2

Distribution of body sites of Candida species with different fluconazole susceptibility

 

MICs 64 mg/l

MICs 8 mg/l

Total

Source

C. albicans

C. glabrata

C. tropicalis

Subtotal

C. albicans

C. glabrata

C. tropicalis

Subtotal

number

%

Urine

0

5

11

16

4

11

15

30

46

52.3

Sputum

4

1

5

10

5

3

3

11

21

23.9

Blood

0

0

3

3

0

3

0

3

6

6.8

Wound

2

0

0

2

1

0

2

3

5

5.7

Fluid

0

1

0

1

1

0

1

2

3

3.4

Genital tract

1

1

1

3

1

1

1

3

6

6.8

Catheter tip

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1.1

Total

7

8

20

35

12

18

23

53

88

100

MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; Fluid consisted of ascites, dialysate, and peritoneal fluid.

The analysis of fluconazole susceptibility according to characteristics of different patients is shown in Table 3. There was no significant difference correlated to host factors such as different demographic characteristics and underlying diseases other than the possibility of pulmonary tuberculosis. The observation that patients with pulmonary diseases, particularly those receiving antituberculous agents were found to be more frequently colonized or infected with fluconazole resistant yeasts requires further investigation. Although patients' ages did not significantly differ between two groups, we still adjust its effect in the multivariate analysis because age might influence hosts' underlying conditions the acquisition of infections. In a logistic regression, which included the presence of pulmonary diseases (yes/no), use of antituberculous agents (yes/no) and age (continuous in years), the former two showed some associations but age did not (p = 0.23, details no shown). Use of antituberculous agents was associated with an odds ratio (OR) = 4.2, p = 0.05 for the resistance to the fluconazole, while the presence of pulmonary diseases was with OR = 2.7, p = 0.1.
Table 3

Characteristics of patients colonized or infected with Candida species

   

Fluconazole susceptibility

 

Characteristics

Total

MICs 64 mg/l

MICs 8 mg/l

 

Mean of age (years)

65.5

65.0

66.3

 

Duration of hospital stay (days)

58.0 (N = 78)

60.0 (N = 30)

56.7 (N = 48)

 

Duration of fever (days)

10.2 (N = 62)

10.7 (N = 24)

9.8 (N = 38)

 
 

number

%

number

%

number

%

p value

Hospitalization

80

91

32

91

48

90.6

0.81

   Medical units

59

75

23

71.2

36

75

0.99

   Surgery units

21

25

9

28.8

12

25

0.94

   Intensive care units

39

43.3

17

48.6

22

41.5

0.51

Fever ( 38°C)

58

72.5

22

62.9

36

67.9

0.79

Age > 65

57

64.8

22

62.9

35

66

0.76

Male

43

48.9

19

54.3

24

45.3

0.41

Mobility affected

60

68.2

23

65.7

37

69.8

0.69

Underlying diseases

       

   Diabetes

38

43.2

14

40

24

45.3

0.62

   Pulmonary diseases

15

17.1

9

25.7

6

11.3

0.08

   Hypertension

10

11.4

4

11.4

6

11.3

1

   Bacterial infection

57

64.8

22

62.9

35

66.0

0.76

Special medications or managements

       

   Antifungal agents

18

20.5

7

20.0

11

20.8

0.93

   Antibiotics

76

86.4

29

82.9

47

88.7

0.53

   Antituberculosis agents

10

11.4

7

20

3

5.7

0.05

   Dialysis

4

4.6

1

2.9

3

5.7

0.65

   Catheter insertion

70

79.6

28

80.0

42

69.3

0.85

Mortality

38

43.2

16

45.7

22

41.5

0.87

Total

88

100

35

100

53

100

 

Discussion

It is well established that mechanically supported or immunocompromised patients with invasive devices are at increasing risk of colonization and infection with pathogenic yeasts [5, 17]. The findings of this study further suggest that there is no difference in frequency between fluconazole resistant and susceptible Candida species to colonize or infect individual patients according to the host factors analyzed. Hence, fluconazole resistant strains do not appear to have more advantage than susceptible ones in these patients. Many nosocomial Candida infections are endogenously acquired [1821]. It is much more likely that the increase of fluconazole resistant yeasts has resulted from the intense use of fluconazole in response to increasing prevalence of nosocomial yeast infections.

In the previous study, the resistant rate was found to associate with regions and hospital types [13]. In this study, we set out to investigate whether the hosts per se was an influencing factor, since regional difference may be a reflection of host characters. As it turned out, patients receiving antituberculous agents had higher occurrence to be colonized or infected with fluconazole resistant strains. These 10 ten patients receiving antituberculous agents were not associated with either regions or types of hospital.

Among HIV-infected patients, treatment with antituberculous drugs, previous history of tuberculosis, and fluconazole exposure are the risks for development of oropharyngeal colonization or infections by fluconazole-resistant Candida strains [22]. Noteworthily, findings from this study indicate that non-HIV infected patients receiving antituberculous agents had higher occurrence to be colonized or infected with fluconazole resistant strains. Interestingly, a link between mycobacterial infections and oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients has been reported. The prevalence of Candida species colonization or infections in AIDS patients in the tuberculous group was 2.5-fold higher than that without tuberculosis [23]. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that antituberculous agents may change the microbial ecosystem in the body to favor Candida species [22]. Antibiotics, such as quinolones, reduces the effects of antifungal agents in a murine model of invasive candidiasis [24]. Hence, antituberculous agents may also antagonize the effects of antifungal agents to prolong survival of Candida species and consequently the development of drug resistance. The mechanism by which the usage of antituberculous agents is a risk for colonizing or infecting with fluconazole resistant strains is worthy of further study by a larger series.

Abbreviations

TSARY: 

Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance of Yeasts

MIC: 

minimum inhibitory concentration

NHRI: 

National Health Research Institutes

CLSI: 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

IRB: 

Institutional Review Board.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank C. M. Kunin for his critical review of the manuscript and Pfizer for supplying the fluconazole. We also thank the nine participating hospitals for providing clinical isolates and information regarding to these isolates. They are Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Taipei Municipal Zen Ai Hospital, Tri Service General Hospital, Veterans General Hospital-Taichung, Tainan Municipal Hospital, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital, Mackay Memorial Hospital Taitung Branch, and Kaohsiung Medical College Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital. This study was supported by the grant NHRI CL-096-PP07.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung
(3)
National Yang-Ming University
(4)
Division of Clinical Research, National Health Research Institutes
(5)
Section of Infection Diseases, Taipei Municipal Zen Ai Hospital
(6)
Section of Infection Diseases, Mackay Memorial Hospital Taitung Branch
(7)
Division of Infectious Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
(8)
Section of Infection Diseases, Tainan Municipal Hospital
(9)
Section of Infection Diseases, Kaohsiung Medical College Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
(10)
Section of Infection Diseases, Buddhist, Tzu-Chi General Hospital
(11)
Section of Infection Diseases, Veterans General Hospital-Taichung
(12)
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital-Chiayi

References

  1. Chen YC, Chang SC, Sun CC, Yang LS, Hsieh WC, Luh KT: Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections at a teaching hospital in Taiwan, 1981 to 1993. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997, 18 (5): 369-375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng MF, Yu KW, Tang RB, Fan YH, Yang YL, Hsieh KS, Ho M, Lo HJ: Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species causing candidemia from 1996 to 1999. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2004, 48 (1): 33-37. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2003.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hung CC, Yang YL, Lauderdale TL, McDonald LC, Hsiao CF, Cheng HH, Ho YA, Lo HJ: Colonization of human immunodeficiency virus-infected outpatients in Taiwan with Candida species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005, 43 (4): 1600-1603. 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1600-1603.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB: Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39 (3): 309-317. 10.1086/421946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. White TC, Marr KA, Bowden RA: Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1998, 11 (2): 382-402.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang YL, Lo HJ: Mechanisms of antifungal agent resistance. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2001, 34 (2): 79-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marr KA, Lyons CN, Ha K, Rustad TR, White TC: Inducible azole resistance associated with a heterogeneous phenotype in Candida albicans. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2001, 45 (1): 52-59. 10.1128/AAC.45.1.52-59.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ: Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1,586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by Broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods: report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003, 41 (4): 1440-1446. 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1440-1446.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang YL, Wang AH, Wang CW, Cheng WT, Li SY, Lo HJ, Hospitals T: Susceptibilities to amphotericin B and fluconazole of Candida species in TSARY 2006. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2008, 61 (2): 175-180. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang YL, Ho YA, Cheng HH, Lo HJ: Distribution and susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole of Candida spp. isolated from Taiwan. Epidemiology and Infection. 2005, 133 (2): 325-330. 10.1017/S0950268804003310.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Yang YL, Cheng HH, Lo HJ: In vitro activity of voriconazole against Candida species isolated in Taiwan. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2004, 24 (3): 294-296. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.01.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clinical, Laboratory Standards I: Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. M27A, Wayne, PA. 1997Google Scholar
  13. Yang YL, Cheng HH, Ho YA, Hsiao CF, Lo HJ: Fluconazole resistance rate of Candida species from different regions and hospital types in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003, 36 (3): 187-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang YL, Cheng HH, Lo HJ: Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from different age populations in Taiwan. Med Mycol. 2006, 44 (3): 237-242. 10.1080/13693780500401213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lo HJ, Ho AH, Ho M: Factors accounting for mis-identification of Candida species. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection. 2001, 34: 171-177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang YL, Ho YA, Cheng HH, Ho M, Lo HJ: Susceptibilities of Candida species to amphotericin B and fluconazole: the emergence of fluconazole resistance in Candida tropicalis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2004, 25 (1): 60-64. 10.1086/502294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang YL: Virulence factors of Candida species. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2003, 36 (4): 223-228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chou HH, Lo HJ, Chen KW, Liao MH, Li SY: Multilocus sequence typing of Candida tropicalis shows clonal cluster enriched in isolates with resistance or trailing growth of fluconazole. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2007, 58 (4): 427-433. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Li SY, Yang YL, Chen KW, Cheng HH, Chiou CS, Wang TH, Lauderdale TL, Hung CC, Lo HJ: Molecular epidemiology of long-term colonization of Candida albicans strains from HIV-infected patients. Epidemiology and Infection. 2006, 134 (2): 265-269. 10.1017/S0950268805004905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin CY, Chen YC, Lo HJ, Chen KW, Li SY: Assessment of Candida glabrata strain relatedness by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2007, 45 (8): 2452-2459. 10.1128/JCM.00699-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang JS, Li SY, Yang YL, Chou HH, Lo HJ: Association between fluconazole susceptibility and genetic relatedness among Candida tropicalis isolates in Taiwan. J Med Microbiol. 2007, 56 (Pt 5): 650-653. 10.1099/jmm.0.46664-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Masia CM, Gutierrez RF, Ortiz de la Tabla D, Hernandez AI, Martin GC, Sanchez SA, Martin HA: Determinants for the development of oropharyngeal colonization or infection by fluconazole-resistant Candida strains in HIV-infected patients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2000, 19 (8): 593-601. 10.1007/s100960000323.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Cavaliere MJ, Maeda MY, Longatto FA, Shirata NK, Santos RT, Kitamura C, Ueki SY, Martins MC: Frequency of Candida sp infection in tuberculous patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: morphological and immunocytochemical study in sputum. Pathologica. 1994, 86 (4): 409-411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sugar AM, Liu XP, Chen RJ: Effectiveness of quinolone antibiotics in modulating the effects of antifungal drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997, 41 (11): 2518-2521.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement