The CTGF -945GC polymorphism is not associated with plasma CTGF and does not predict nephropathy or outcome in type 1 diabetes

  • Amélie Dendooven1,

    Affiliated with

    • Tri Q Nguyen1,

      Affiliated with

      • Lodewijk Brosens1,

        Affiliated with

        • Dongxia Li2,

          Affiliated with

          • Lise Tarnow3,

            Affiliated with

            • Hans-Henrik Parving4,

              Affiliated with

              • Peter Rossing3 and

                Affiliated with

                • Roel Goldschmeding1Email author

                  Affiliated with

                  Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine201110:4

                  DOI: 10.1186/1477-5751-10-4

                  Received: 7 September 2010

                  Accepted: 8 May 2011

                  Published: 8 May 2011

                  Abstract

                  The -945GC polymorphism (rs6918698) in the connective tissue growth factor gene promoter (CTGF/CCN-2) has been associated with end organ damage in systemic sclerosis. Because CTGF is important in progression of diabetic kidney disease, we investigated whether the -945GC polymorphism is associated with plasma CTGF level and outcome in type 1 diabetes.

                  The study cohort consisted of 448 diabetic nephropathy patients and 419 normoalbuminuric diabetic patients with complete data concerning renal function and cardiovascular characteristics. Genomic DNA was genotyped by a QPCR-based SNP assay. We observed no relation between the -945GC polymorphism and plasma CTGF level, and the genotype frequencies were not different in nephropathy patients vs. normoalbuminuric controls. General and cardiovascular mortality, and renal function decline was similar in patients with CC, CG or GG genotypes.

                  In conclusion, the -945GC SNP does not affect plasma CTGF levels, incidence and prognosis of diabetic nephropathy, and cardiovascular outcome.

                  Findings

                  Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN-2) is a key peptide mediating organ fibrosis [13]. Fonseca et al. identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at position -945 upstream from the transcription initiation site of the CTGF gene (-945GC) overrepresented in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and associated with a higher incidence of lung fibrosis [4]. Subsequent studies have either confirmed or questioned the association of the G allele with incidence and severity of SSc, and its relation with in vivo CTGF expression levels has not been studied to date [5, 6]. Also in diabetic nephropathy, CTGF is an important pathogenic factor, and plasma CTGF levels independently predict mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [7]. A recent study in hemodialysis patients indicated that the -945GC polymorphism might be associated with cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality [8]. Therefore, we examined the possible relevance of the -945GC polymorphism for plasma CTGF levels, and for nephropathy and associated manifestations in patients with type 1 diabetes.

                  General characteristics and baseline parameters of patients are summarized in Table 1.
                  Table 1

                  Patient characteristics at baseline

                   

                  Diabetic Nephropathy

                  Normoalbuminuria

                  P-value

                  Patient characteristics

                     

                  N (% male)

                  448 (60.9)

                  419 (54.4)

                  p = 0.02

                  Age (years)

                  42.2 ± 10.5

                  45.3 ± 11.5

                  p < 0.001

                  Duration of DM (years)

                  28.2 ± 8.7

                  27.8 ± 10.1

                  p = 0.025

                  BMI (kg/m2)

                  24.2 ± 3.3

                  24.1 ± 2.9

                  p = 0.7

                  Retinopathy (nil/simplex/proliferative)

                  7/135/306

                  151/159/109

                  p < 0.001

                  Antihypertensiva (no/yes)

                  95/308

                  351/68

                  p < 0.001

                  Smokers (%)

                  46

                  39

                  p = 0.05

                  Glycemic control

                     

                  Blood glucose (mmol/l)

                  11.0 ± 5.4

                  9.4 ± 4.7

                  p < 0.001

                  HbA1c (%)

                  9.4 ± 1.5

                  8.4 ± 1.1

                  p < 0.001

                  Parameters of Nephropathy

                     

                  UAE (mg/24 h)

                  593.1 (250.0-1519.5)

                  7.0 (4.0-12.0)

                  p < 0.001

                  Plasma creatinine (μmol/l)

                  102 (82.0-136.3)

                  79 (53-81)

                  p < 0.001

                  GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

                  66.1 ± 27.7

                  87.4 ± 14.9

                  p < 0.001

                  ESRD (%male)

                  24 (70.8)

                  0

                  p < 0.001

                  Systolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)

                  144.3 ± 21.8

                  133.8 ± 18.6

                  p < 0.001

                  Diastolic Blood Pressure (mm Hg)

                  82.5 ± 12.2

                  76.1 ± 9.6

                  p < 0.001

                  Data are presented as mean ± SD, median (interquartile range), or N (%). The study was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethical committee of Copenhagen County. All patients gave informed consent.

                  Smoking and body mass index (BMI) did not differ significantly between diabetic nephropathy and normoalbuminuric subjects. Retinopathy, blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medication, and parameters of nephropathy were all higher in the diabetic nephropathy group as compared to the normoalbuminuric subjects.

                  Genomic DNA was genotyped by a Custom-Taqman-SNP-Genotyping-Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) for the GC polymorphism at position -945. The distributions of the genotypes were in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the entire population (p = 0.52), and the subgroups divided by presence or absence of nephropathy (p = 0.49 and p = 0.10 respectively). Genotype frequencies were very similar between diabetic nephropathy and diabetic normoalbuminuric patients, with a frequency of the G allele of 22.8% in the DN group as compared to 21.9% in the NA group (p = 0.481) (Table 2). The power of the study was determined using web-based software (http://​www.​stat.​ubc.​ca/​~rollin/​stats/​ssize/​b2.​html). This showed a power of 95% for detection of a 10% increase in DN patients of the GG genotype frequency, i.e. an increase to 31.9% in DN as compared to the 21.9% in the NA patients which was comparable with the previously observed range of 30 to 20% in diseased vs. control groups [4].
                  Table 2

                  Distribution of genotype and allele frequencies for the CTGF promoter polymorphism at -945

                   

                  Genotype frequencies (%)

                  Total

                  P-value

                  CTGF -945GC polymorphism

                  Diabetic Nephropathy

                  Normoalbuminuria

                    

                  CC

                  126 (28.1)

                  126 (30.1)

                  252 (29.0)

                  0.481

                  CG

                  220 (49.1)

                  201 (48.0)

                  421 (48.6)

                   

                  GG

                  102 (22.8)

                  92 (21.9)

                  194 (22.4)

                   

                  Total

                  448 (100)

                  448 (100)

                  867 (100)

                   
                   

                  Allele frequencies (%)

                  Odds ratio

                  P-value

                  CTGF -945 promoter polymorphism

                  Diabetic Nephropathy

                  Normoalbuminuria

                    

                  Allele C

                  472 (52.7)

                  453 (54.0)

                  1.057

                  0.596

                  Allele G

                  424 (47.3)

                  385 (46.0)

                    

                  P-values were calculated using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square analysis respectively. There is no difference in genotype or allele frequencies between diabetic nephropathy patients and normoalbuminuric patients at baseline.

                  Plasma CTGF levels were determined in a subset of 381 by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using monoclonal antibodies against two distinct epitopes of human CTGF (FibroGen, San Francisco, CA) as described previously [7]. Diabetic nephropathy was associated with significantly elevated CTGF levels (381.3 pmol/l (270.3-626.4) in DN vs. 235.2 pmol/l (168.1-352.9) in normoalbuminuria, p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in CTGF levels between genotypes (Figure 1). Also, linear regression analysis could not predict plasma CTGF levels from genotype (not shown).
                  http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-5751-10-4/MediaObjects/12952_2010_94_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                  Figure 1

                  Relation of plasma CTGF levels (pmol/l) with genotype. Bars are median+interquartile range. White bars: normoalbuminuric diabetic patients (N = 173); black bars: diabetic patients with nephropathy (N = 198). Plasma CTGF levels are higher in DN (p < 0.0001, ANOVA on log transformed values for conversion to a normal distribution of positively skewed data). There is no significant difference in plasma levels according to genotype. Number of patients in each group is indicated in italics above the error bars.

                  The mean follow-up time in the diabetic nephropathy group was comparable to that in the normoalbuminuric group, 9.0 ± 3.3 and 8.6 ± 3.2 years, respectively. At follow-up, the presence of renal and cardiovascular endpoints was compared with genotype. There were no significant differences between the CC, CG and GG genotypes in terms of mortality or development of ESRD in the total population under study (Table 3). Also, in separate analyses of normoalbuminuric patients and patients with nephropathy there was no difference in incidence of ESRD, total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or non-fatal cardiovascular events between the different genotypes (all p > 0.05). None of the normoalbuminuric patients developed ESRD over the studied period.
                  Table 3

                  Association of the CTGF promoter polymorphism at -945 with clinical outcomes at follow-up

                     

                  CC (%)

                  CG (%)

                  GG (%)

                  Total (%)

                  P-value

                  Diabetic nephropathy

                  Mortality

                  Yes

                  42 (30)

                  62 (44)

                  36 (26)

                  140 (100)

                  0.369

                    

                  No

                  84 (27)

                  158 (51)

                  66 (22)

                  308 (100)

                   
                   

                  Cardiovascular (CV) death

                  Yes

                  20 (27)

                  35 (48)

                  18 (25)

                  73 (100)

                  0.915

                    

                  No

                  106 (28)

                  185 (49)

                  84 (23)

                  375 (100)

                   
                   

                  Non-fatal CV event

                  Yes

                  40 (35)

                  50 (43)

                  25 (22)

                  115 (100)

                  0.173

                    

                  No

                  86 (26)

                  170 (51)

                  77 (23)

                  333 (100)

                   
                   

                  End-stage renal failure

                  Yes

                  29 (30)

                  46 (47)

                  23 (23)

                  98 (100)

                  0.886

                    

                  No

                  97 (28)

                  174 (50)

                  79 (22)

                  350 (100)

                   

                  Normoalbuminuria

                  Mortality

                  Yes

                  14 (40)

                  15 (43)

                  6 (17)

                  35 (100)

                  0.394

                    

                  No

                  112 (29)

                  186 (48)

                  86 (22)

                  384 (100)

                   
                   

                  Cardiovascular (CV) death

                  Yes

                  4 (31)

                  6 (46)

                  3 (23)

                  13 (100)

                  0.991

                    

                  No

                  122 (30)

                  195 (48)

                  89 (22)

                  406 (100)

                   
                   

                  Non-fatal CV event

                  Yes

                  15 (37)

                  20 (49)

                  6 (14)

                  41 (100)

                  0.415

                    

                  No

                  111 (29)

                  181 (48)

                  86 (23)

                  378 (100)

                   
                   

                  Microalbuminuria

                  Yes

                  21 (38)

                  25 (45)

                  9 (16)

                  55 (100)

                  0.306

                    

                  No

                  105 (29)

                  176 (48)

                  83 (23)

                  364 (100)

                   
                   

                  Development of nephropathy

                  Yes

                  0 (0)

                  1 (100)

                  0 (0)

                  1 (100)

                  0.581

                    

                  No

                  126 (30)

                  200 (48)

                  92 (22)

                  418 (100)

                   

                  There is no effect of the -945GG genotype on either mortality, fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events, or development of renal disease. P-values are calculated using Fisher's exact test.

                  Altogether, this makes it doubtful that the -945GC polymorphism plays a major role in susceptibility to developing DN. Apparently, the association of the CTGF -945GC SNP with disease is not the same in all patient groups and categories, as has been noted in previous studies that could not always confirm the originally observed association of the -945GC SNP with Ssc [4, 5]. Although, theoretically, population differences might affect the apparent contribution of SNPs to disease manifestations, one of these reports examined a large number of patients of diverse nationality and ethnicity but could not replicate the association of the G allele with SSc [6].

                  It has been observed that CTGF levels are higher in Ssc patients as compared to healthy controls [9], but a possible association of serum or plasma CTGF levels with genotype has not been assessed. This hampers an adequate interpretation of the effect of the polymorphism on in vivo CTGF transcription and translation. Therefore, we compared genotype differences for the -945CG polymorphism with plasma CTGF levels in DN and NA patients with diabetes. We found that plasma CTGF levels were not associated with this polymorphism, which further questions its relevance in diabetic kidney disease. In contrast, it has recently been shown that the G allele of an SNP (with a population frequency of around 5%) at -20 in the promoter region of the CTGF gene was associated with an increased risk towards developing micro- and macroalbuminuria via increased CTGF promoter activity depending on Smad1 [10]. It will be interesting to learn whether this SNP affects plasma CTGF levels.

                  Studies regarding other SNPs in the CTGF promoter have been published before, and most of these deny a contribution of CTGF SNPs to human disease. Three other potentially functional SNPs in the CTGF gene (at positions -650, -484 and 247) have been reported not to be associated with diabetic nephropathy [11]. A large study using transmission equilibrium testing revealed no relationship with diabetic nephropathy at yet another SNP (rs9493150) in the CTGF gene [12]. In a study from Thailand, an SNP at position -447 was analysed in the context of biliary atresia and no association was observed with either incidence of biliary atresia or occurrence of postoperative jaundice [13]. Finally, none of six CTGF gene polymorphisms (including the -945GC SNP) studied in chronic hepatitis C infection was associated with the severity of hepatic fibrosis [14]. However, a recent study in a French population did show that the frequency of the rs9399005TT genotype was lower in Ssc than in control patients, and that the T allele was associated with altered mRNA stability [15]. This is an interesting finding awaiting validation in independent studies of Ssc patients, given the large discrepancies between different studies on polymorphisms even in the same disease. To conclude, in our cohort of 867 Northern European type 1 diabetes patients, the previously described -945GC SNP appears not to have a major impact on plasma CTGF levels, incidence and prognosis of nephropathy, and cardiovascular outcome.

                  List of abbreviations

                  ANOVA: 

                  analysis of variance

                  BMI: 

                  body mass index

                  CTGF: 

                  connective tissue growth factor

                  DM: 

                  diabetes mellitus

                  DN: 

                  diabetic nephropathy

                  ELISA: 

                  enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

                  ESRD: 

                  end-stage renal disease

                  GFR: 

                  glomerular filtration rate

                  NA: 

                  normoalbuminuria

                  NS: 

                  non significant

                  QPCR: 

                  quantitative PCR

                  SD: 

                  standard deviation

                  SNP: 

                  single nucleotide polymorphism

                  SSc: 

                  systemic sclerosis

                  UAE: 

                  urinary albumin excretion.

                  Declarations

                  Acknowledgements

                  We thank Rutger van Petersen for excellent statistical advice.

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  (1)
                  Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht
                  (2)
                  FibroGen Inc
                  (3)
                  Steno Diabetes Center
                  (4)
                  Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet University Hospital

                  References

                  1. Shi-Wen X, Leask A, Abraham D: Regulation and function of connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 in tissue repair, scarring and fibrosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2008, 19:133–144.PubMedView Article
                  2. Grotendorst GR, Okochi H, Hayashi N: A novel transforming growth factor beta response element controls the expression of the connective tissue growth factor gene. Cell Growth Differ 1996, 7:469–480.PubMed
                  3. Leask A, Abraham DJ: All in the CCN family: essential matricellular signaling modulators emerge from the bunker. J Cell Sci 2006, 119:4803–4810.PubMedView Article
                  4. Fonseca C, Lindahl GE, Ponticos M, Sestini P, Renzoni EA, Holmes AM, Spagnolo P, Pantelidis P, Leoni P, McHugh N, et al.: A polymorphism in the CTGF promoter region associated with systemic sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1210–1220.PubMedView Article
                  5. Kawaguchi Y, Ota Y, Kawamoto M, Ito I, Tsuchiya N, Sugiura T, Katsumata Y, Soejima M, Sato S, Hasegawa M, et al.: Association study of a polymorphism of the CTGF gene and susceptibility to systemic sclerosis in the Japanese population. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:1921–1924.PubMedView Article
                  6. Rueda B, Simeon C, Hesselstrand R, Herrick A, Worthington J, Ortego-Centeno N, Riemekasten G, Fonollosa V, Vonk MC, van den Hoogen FH, et al.: A large multicentre analysis of CTGF -945 promoter polymorphism does not confirm association with systemic sclerosis susceptibility or phenotype. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:1618–1620.PubMedView Article
                  7. Nguyen TQ, Tarnow L, Jorsal A, Oliver N, Roestenberg P, Ito Y, Parving HH, Rossing P, van Nieuwenhoven FA, Goldschmeding R: Plasma connective tissue growth factor is an independent predictor of end-stage renal disease and mortality in type 1 diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:1177–1182.PubMedView Article
                  8. Cozzolino M, Biondi ML, Banfi E, Riser BL, Mehmeti F, Cusi D, Gallieni M: CCN2 (CTGF) gene polymorphism is a novel prognostic risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Blood Purif 2010, 30:272–276.PubMedView Article
                  9. Dziadzio M, Usinger W, Leask A, Abraham D, Black CM, Denton C, Stratton R: N-terminal connective tissue growth factor is a marker of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma. QJM 2005, 98:485–492.PubMedView Article
                  10. Wang B, Carter RE, Jaffa MA, Nakerakanti S, Lackland D, Lopes-Virella M, Trojanowska M, Luttrell LM, Jaffa AA: Genetic variant in the promoter of connective tissue growth factor gene confers susceptibility to nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. J Med Genet 2010, 47:391–397.PubMedView Article
                  11. McKnight AJ, Savage DA, Patterson CC, Brady HR, Maxwell AP: Resequencing of the characterised CTGF gene to identify novel or known variants, and analysis of their association with diabetic nephropathy. J Hum Genet 2006, 51:383–386.PubMedView Article
                  12. Ewens KG, George RA, Sharma K, Ziyadeh FN, Spielman RS: Assessment of 115 candidate genes for diabetic nephropathy by transmission/disequilibrium test. Diabetes 2005, 54:3305–3318.PubMedView Article
                  13. Sa-nguanmoo P, Vejchapipat P, Chongsrisawat V, Chirathaworn C, Honsawek S, Theamboonlers A, Poovorawan Y: Analysis of connective tissue growth factor promoter polymorphism in Thai children with biliary atresia. J Med Assoc Thai 2007, 90:251–257.PubMed
                  14. Kovalenko E, Tacke F, Gressner OA, Zimmermann HW, Lahme B, Janetzko A, Wiederholt T, Berg T, Muller T, Trautwein C, et al.: Validation of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) and its gene polymorphisms as noninvasive biomarkers for the assessment of liver fibrosis. J Viral Hepat 2009, 16:612–620.PubMedView Article
                  15. Granel B, Argiro L, Hachulla E, Fajardy I, Weiller PJ, Durand JM, Frances Y, Dombey AM, Marquet S, Lesavre N, et al.: Association Between a CTGF Gene Polymorphism and Systemic Sclerosis in a French Population. J Rheumatol 2009, 37:351–358.PubMedView Article

                  Copyright

                  © Dendooven et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

                  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                  Advertisement